• t1ppz3r0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the city of utrecht. One of the biggest cities of the Netherlands. They started restoring the city center about 15 years ago. The traffic was either put outside or reduced. Biking, trams and buses take care of mass transit. It’s parts of the cu2030 project (stations gebieded) https://cu2030.nl/ if you want to know more. the project has been a great success and is used as a blueprint for other cities in the country.

  • 𝓒𝓸𝓼𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓽@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    My city is planning to make a sports area in a patch of vacant land in the middle of town, the plans show that the frickin’ parking lots take up about 50% of the whole site! They are also building brand new baseball fields there even when we already have 3 right now that’s only 1.63 km away. They haven’t started any construction yet so I’m contemplating a Lil sabotaging, maybe plant some bamboo in that area idk.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      A local tower development - one as high as 92 storeys - is also getting a community centre in the middle. The community centre is 8 storeys, with parking underneath THAT.

      in short, put the parking underground. I came to say that. If they don’t have a solution that involves parking safely out of the way, then it should fail at city hall.

      When the local hospital built a new tower, I was surprised to see they used NONE of the 60-80 feet under-neath the new block for parking. And by parking, I mean 2000 10x20 partitioned but unsegregated underground storage areas that can be used for cars, hoarding of medical equipment in a pre-pandemic phase, or for emergency ward space later. So, everything you’d want to do with your parking lot, but also out of the elements and well-served by power, lighting and security.

      • morhp@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        Bamboo grows and spreads fast and is very hard to remove as it builds a strong network of underground roots. You need very heavy machinery to get rid of it.

        • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          The perfect plan. They definitely won’t have any heavy machinery when they show up to start construction on a new sports arena.

          • morhp@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lol, yes. I can’t imagine that it would help much, but it would definitely be annoying. Especially for the parking lot. Imagine that instead of basically flattening the ground and pouring asphalt over it, you’d have to tear apart a thick bamboo forest yard by yard. Also they’d need to make really sure to remove all of the bamboo, or else it could grow back, maybe even through the asphalt.

      • TaintPuncher@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Attract pandas, which are a protected species and thus cannot be relocated and prevent construction in the immediate area. Oldest trick in the book.

  • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I feel like this picture is misleading. The first one was taken a lot further away from those towers and you can see most of the trees were already there. The first picture is also taken in rainy weather which makes everything seem way more dull than it really is. It’s hard to tell what has actually changed between these two pictures, if anything at all.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    We ain’t doing shit “when the boomers die” except fight over water and resources on a dying world. Like, I appreciate the optimism, but…

    • PilferJynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not only that, cities don’t even want to pony up the cash for repairing potholes let alone massive landscaping projects.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Besides that a significant portion of the youth is turning hard-right as we speak. Young progressives always think all young people are like them.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s paired with an even greater portion turning far-left. Overall, Gen Z is far more progressive than reactionary, though there are radical fascists as well.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I haven’t seen any data or polling that supports this. A larger portion of young people are “more liberal,” but I’ve not seen anything that says that the extensions of the far, radical right have been met with equal (let alone greater) turns towards leftist political ideology.

          Perhaps you just mean center-left people refer to themselves as “leftists” more often? That’s more of a result of the shift in the Overton window than any actual groundswell of leftist support.

            • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Thanks for the Wikipedia link.

              That you don’t see the difference between the hyper-radicalization of the right and the “progressive pro-government” tendencies of Gen Z is precisely what I’m describing.

              You spend most of your time on this platform talking about videogames and coffee occasionally punctuated by airy anti-capitalist sentiments. The young–and typically white and male–hard right talk about guns and politics, errant and blind though it is, and they train for revolution.

              There is no growing revolutionary sentiment on the left that is meeting, matching, or exceeding the violent revolutionary discourse and “propaganda of the deed” by the right.

              We’re losing. Hiding behind a hope expressed by a Wikipedia article that maybe this “progressive” and “pro government” sentiment is actually what will pull us out of this death spiral actually makes me more pessimistic about the future.

              Go play Starfield.

              “Haha.”

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                There’s radicalization on both sides, but the general trend is to the left.

                What prompted you to dig through my comment history? That’s extremely weird.

                • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Well, my point is, no, it’s not. One “side” is growing more radical, and the other “side” is being more adamant about their social media comments. Does that seem equal to you?

                  “Dig” through your comment history? I took 30 seconds, clicked on your name, scrolled a few times, and then came back. What prompted me to do that? To see if your general profile matches the broad Pollyanna ignorance you’re expressing in this conversation.

  • Jeanschyso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    We laugh, but there are a lot of plans across North America to revert the overuse of car infrastructure. Even Quebec small town, who love saying they’re the opposite of Montreal, are desifying and giving up on doubling lanes on roads, adding bike paths and attempting to work with what they have to reduce solo car usage.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    I thought we were just going to immediately live somewhere affordable, then change jobs…?

    • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, but if we aren’t going to die next Thursday we will have to work do improve shit, and working is hard. Let’s wait for some violent event happening so we don’t have to think about shit

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why not just make a green space? Whats the point of bulldozing and flooding the land underneath the highway? Did a representative for the mosquitos make this meme?

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      THE MOSQUITO LOBBY

      I KNEW IT

      I’m pretty sure this meme is just suggesting making green spaces out of former highways, not literally turning it into a canal.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, you don’t get it. The highway is still there, its just been flooded from global warming

    • Pietson@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      IIRC it was a river before it was a highway, and they decided to restore it to it’s natural state.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also, the river probably doesn’t suit the transportation of goods necessary for high population densities. Maybe an underground rail?

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Okay, pal, go ahead and transport 30,000 kilos of produce upriver within the next 2 days 16 times and tell me how efficient this river idea works out.

          Spoiler: It’s gonna be terrible.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I don’t think the Goudvis cargo ship’s 18 Meter Width is going to fit in the canal depicted above in Utrecht, just a hunch. I can’t speak for this cargo ship specifically but cargo ships in general are incapable of going upriver.

              • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Feel free to nitpick this random image I got from the internet somewhere, but if you’re really that worried; there’s still a road next to the canal.

      • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The dutch have more than one road (surprising, I know). Removing the eyesore won’t impact their shipping and transport

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Removing a 4 or 6 way interchange absolutely would impact shipping and transport, which is why I suggested underground rail as a replacement.

          • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            As neither of us are civil engineers, I’m going to stick with my intuition on this until you can provide proof of impact.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You have no idea of my titles, but thanks for reiterating that you have no idea what you’re talking about.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’re Dutch.

      They get all antsy-in-their-pantsy of they can’t see water from where they’re standing.

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You mean bulldozing and flooding the land that they drained and paved? It was a canal before it was paved in the 70’s

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’ll have to tell the community of gen-Zers that they’re not allowed to live under that bridge first.