• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’re lying. That’s why I called you a liar.

    Gnome is the most consistent. That’s an objective, factual statement.

    No, you talked about a Windows UX clone. We get it, you want everything to be a Windows clone.

    Just more consistent

    Lmao

    Anyway, there’s such a thing as ergonomics.

    Something gnome does very well and Windows and its clones don’t.

    Honestly, I don’t know why only Gnome devs seems to care about consistency and ergonomics. It’s maddening.

    BTW, about Windows - w2k and xp were very good in terms of ergonomics.

    HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

    HAHAHAHAHAA

    HAHAHAHA

    HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

    AHAHAHAHAHA

    HAHAHAHAH

    Lol

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      So you don’t have any arguments and apparently think that repeating shit will make it true.

      Any amount of “HAHAHA” is not an argument, and like I said, ergonomics is not a subjective thing.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’ve comprehensively dismantled everything you’ve said.

        We get it, Gnome makes you cry like a little baby and you want a lousy Windows clone, anything else makes your little Microsoft-gimped brain hurt.

        Stick to your Windows with its shit ergonomics lmao. I’ll stick to the best desktop for ergonomics hands-down.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Lmao, Plasma and Cinnamon are literally Windows clones. Gnome is nothing like it.

            Do you see a taskbar at the bottom? A start button? Menu bar? System tray in the bottom right? Clock in the bottom right? Minimise, Maximise, Close at the top right of each Window? Nah. That’s Windows and its clones like Plasma and Cinnamon.

            Also fuck off

            Aww I huwt the wittle baby’s feewings :‘’(

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Gnome is nothing like it.

              Which at best would be its only achievement.

              Do you see a taskbar at the bottom? A start button? Menu bar? System tray in the bottom right? Clock in the bottom right? Minimise, Maximise, Close at the top right of each Window?

              Apparently RISC OS, AmigaOS and NextStep were Windows clones.

              See, that’s why Gnome is appropriately treated as crap. Because its developers and users alike are similar to you in general.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                First you say it’s a Windows clone, then you concede it isn’t. Make your mind up 🤣

                Cinnamon and Plasma are Windows clones. That’s fine if what you want is a Windows clone. I don’t. I want a consistent, good looking DE free of ancient design cruft and free of the shitty Windows workflow.

                Nah, only weird losers who want a Windows clone cry about Gnome. WAAAAHHHHHH THIS ISNT LIKE WINDOWS!!! WHERE’S MY TASKBAR 😭😭😭😭

                Gnome is treated very well. It’s the most commonly found default amongst distros. Because it’s the most trusted.

                Don’t get me started on the absolute bug-fest that Plasma is. Literally unusable. Cinnamon, while a Windows clone, is at least stable. Probably because it’s Gnome-based.