The predominantly ludicrous lawmaker from Georgia did Biden a solid this weekend, telling Republicans the Democratic president is fiendishly attempting to make people’s lives better.

  • Mayoman68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If by “left” you mean democrats then they will not do this because it is not what their views are. They are ideologically as neoliberal as Reagan and Thatcher. This is part of why they don’t do as good of a job opposing the far right as they could, because they only exist as long as their only opposition is unhinged far right politicians.

    • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And I would say that’s fairly representative of the views most voters have. The left needs to win the argument with voters before they can complain about the politicians.

      • Mayoman68@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean the opinions of the voting public are nearly always more complex than either Republican or Democratic party dogma. The problem is that there is no substantial way of politically engaging besides voting. I would argue actually that generally the public is way more left wing than it is given credit for, but a lot of people have no accessible ways to transform these ideas into action. And for this I don’t have an easy answer. Disclaimer, am a leftist so I would obviously think this, but I do still think that we would see more diverse political ideas if our political systems were made to be more open.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I fuckin wish the Dems were reliably neoliberal, in the vein of Clinton(s).

      Neoliberalism is dope as fuck. Free trade and open borders let’s gooooo

        • OctopusKurwa @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imagine supporting an ideology that has been nothing but demonstrably harmful to most people except for a tiny handful.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They not only are against student loan forgiveness they also support Tony Blair. Yes that one, the war criminal who helped hand over prisoners to be waterboarded.

            Don’t believe me? Go visit any of the websites that they infest.

        • MrCrankyBastard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I am by no means a Clinton fan, a huge part of the student loan hellscape is less Clinton active malice/stupidity and more Gingrich and company leverage - AKA the usual right-wing obstructionist bullshit that people gave them the numbers to force through. It wasn’t helped by Clinton’s need to cave due to getting sloppy toppies in the Oval Office and the huge stink Newt and Starr raised to get their way…or the Perot school of ‘fuck you I got mine’ Libertarians who apparently needed placating to keep the Dems in office.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes because they held a gun to his head and ordered him to not veto it.

            Neoliberals don’t like student loan forgiveness, they like Clinton who made it very hard to get it forgiven.

            • MrCrankyBastard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No gun is required when so-called self-interests are threatened. He shouldn’t have caved, but then he also shouldn’t have given credence to the welfare and social safety net talking points from the Reich wing. And the CBC damned well shouldn’t have gone along with bullshit ‘tough on crime’ narratives.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                He didn’t veto it and no one forced him. There really is nothing else to say. The neoliberals knew full well the disaster that would follow but not only ignored it they also actively encouraged it.

                Anyone with brains could see that if tuition is rising faster than income and you make student loans inescapable you would end up with mountains of debt. The only two options I can see

                1. They couldn’t see the obvious in which case they should have zero power.

                2. They knew this would happen and wanted it.

                • MrCrankyBastard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t completely disagree, though the argument bears the advantage of hindsight. My suspicion is that the balance of the problem stemmed from the typical right wing obsession with the desire to obliterate the social safety net but the lack of pushback was due to an explicit underestimating of the scope of resulting fuckery - see also those black politicians who didn’t push back on Tough on Crime bullshit. People made bad calls out of panic and circumstances, and fixing the problems are far simpler onbpaper than in application, particularly because of those who see the situation as a feature, not a bug.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Student loan debt balooning is caused by too easy access to loans coupled with too little state funding

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And of course you are not supportive of forgiveness for it. Evidently you are going to continue to evade this issue.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I support forgiveness for student loans based roughly on income level, sure. I don’t think we should be subsidizing wealthy kids more than we already do.

              It should go, basically in order:

              • college dropouts
              • government employees (teachers, social workers etc)
              • others with similar income level and undergrad degrees

              Then finally, mostly unforgiven

              • post-grad degrees
              • wealthy families

              I’m very much in favor of progressive tax and social benefits.

              I’m sorry, are you under the opinion that Democrats don’t push for student loan forgiveness? Biden literally took it to the Supreme Court lmao.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          End occupational licensing, end single family zoning, cut corporate taxes, encourage freer trade and common markets. Raise taxes on non-poor people to pay for social programs. These are core neoliberal tenets.

          Why do you want to make being poor even harder? These are evidenced-based methods of helping poor people.

          • Mayoman68@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I find the “raise taxes to pay for social programs” and “cut corporate taxes” to be somewhat contradictory. Reagan and Thatcher were textbook neoliberals if you need any examples, and they destroyed social programs and labor unions rather than supporting them.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the 80s people also smoked indoors everywhere. Lots of dumb shit happened in the 80s. Then, over 40 years, people got smarter.

              Individual taxes need to go up. Corporate taxes do not

              • Mayoman68@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I fail to see why you think helping corporations earning money will help individuals, especially with raising taxes on them. Corporations’ interests are lower wages and higher prices, worker’s interests are higher wages and lower prices. The only way to then increase wages is to force companies to do so, either through job disloyalty, strikes, regulations, or etc. Don’t see how lower taxes will make them pay more.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Also you could get student loans discharged in bankruptcy and Iraq was a functional country.

                You neoliberals fixed that.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lmao yeah you’re right, something 75% and 90% of Congress voted for, respectively, is the fault of… Neoliberals.

                  As are hurricanes and earthquakes.