Fuck’s sake.

  • Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Man walks into a psychiatrist office. He tells the doctor he speaks in an unknown dialect to a “god”. Is this person committed to an insane asylum? psychiatric institution? Why or why not??

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Considering insane asylums don’t exist anymore that would be a no. But yes, they should probably be prescribed a mandatory stay at a psychiatric facility.

      • Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        So since insane asylum is not used anymore, you couldn’t go ahead fill it in with psychiatric facility? The pedantry never ends

        • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They have different connotations. The words we use are important. We don’t refer to people as “retarded” anymore either for a similar reason.

    • HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      In the US, unless he’s a real direct threat to themselves or someone else’s safety, they would not be detained. People are allowed to be insane as long as they aren’t imminently a real direct threat to anyone’s safety.

      • Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        What if they’re running around nude? Or screaming threatening profanities or making offensive gestures? Many other symptoms could accompany psychotic dillusions which would lead to being involuntarily committed