• Cadeillac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I literally woke my partner up laughing. So he donated to Kamala and appointed Walz to a position. They have both been endorsed by him. This is so delicious

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    As president, Trump appointed Walz to serve on the Council of Governors in 2019. The bipartisan advisory council consists of five Democratic and five Republican governors and helps build federal-state partnerships in matters of homeland security and civil support missions.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    interests of governors across the nation are accurately represented on the council

    Is this just bad wording? Shouldn’t it be the interests of the people whom the governors represent?

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, it is accurate. The committee was about the interests of the governors in the context of differences between states, and while the governor’s interests should align with the people they represent, they don’t always line up.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        In my state it doesn’t like up at all. “I see there’s a lot of hunters and fishermen in this state. How about we sell more land to giant corporations and poison the waterways with farm runoff?” And half of them are like “anything to own the libs! Hyuck hyuck!”

      • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        while the governors’ interests should align with the people they represent, they don’t.

        FTFY

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago
    NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for NBC News:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/live-blog/harris-trump-presidential-election-live-updates-rcna164954/rcrd51257?canonicalCard=true

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    74
    ·
    4 months ago

    This sub would be better with political topics and discussions and not with politicians ads.

    • RCTreeFiddy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      How is this conversation not a political discussion? What makes this an ‘ad’? I’m just curious for your point of view.

      Edit: (forgot ‘this’)

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        4 months ago

        Excuse me but how is suggesting that this sub would be better with political discussions instead of ads a fascist admission?

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          4 months ago

          We’re here discussing a recent political development in real time as the media is covering it. I don’t know what else to tell you. 🤷

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            4 months ago

            All i see is news about trump and harris or someone from their party, no real political discussion.

              • Railing5132@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think, not to put words in anyone’s mouth, that this person is looking for Greek or Roman Senate-levels of debate on the philosophies of democracy and an “elevated discourse”. I’d imagine they think all this we’re concerned with (you know, the future of democracy in the U. S.) is pedestrian.

                Kind of: “iam14andverysmart” material.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You shout like that, you’re a fascist. Right away. No trial, no nothing. Journalists, we have a special fascism for journalists. You are stealing: fascist. You are playing music too loud: fascist, right away.

        Driving too fast: fascist. Slow: fascist. You are charging too high prices for sweaters, glasses: you fascist.

        You undercook fish? Believe it or not, fascist. You overcook chicken, also fascist. Undercook, overcook.

        You make an appointment with the dentist and you don’t show up, believe it or not, fascist, right away.

        We have the best posters in the world because of fascist.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It’s from parks and rec (sorta):

            https://youtu.be/eiyfwZVAzGw?si=Zlrej1VXYf-7xhp_

            Just poking fun at how everything and everyone is fascist now apparently, which dilutes the term. That’s been a typical right-wing discursive maneuver, but apparently the left is doing the work for them now.

            Troubling when there is actual fascism on the rise.

            • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Just poking fun at how everything and everyone is fascist now apparently

              Ahem.

              Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement,[1][2][3] characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.[2][3] Opposed to anarchism, democracy, pluralism, egalitarianism, liberalism, socialism, and Marxism,[4][5] fascism is placed on the far-right wing within the traditional left–right spectrum.

              Which of these don’t fit the republican party exactly?

              • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I’m talking about the person saying there should be more policy conversation in this sub being called a fascist for expressing that opinion.

                My point is there is actual fascism in right-wing politics, which you are echoing, but calling someone a fascist for expressing an opinion about the content of a sub on Lemmy stretches the term beyond meaning.

                • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  So the title of the article posted is: Trump appointed Walz to serve on the Council of Governors in 2019

                  So just so I’m clear; Trump attacks this guys credibility, but also specifically chose him for to serve on a Council. Then this article is posted. Then, someone says it isn’t politics.

                  What are the chances, do you think, that this person genuinely believes that isn’t a worthwhile story, versus, are they pro (Trump) and trying to downplay the significance?

                  You can’t be pro Trump and anti-fascist, so…