In her first interview as the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN it was imperative to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza, but made it clear that she would not alter President Joe Biden’s policy in the region.

However, when pressed on whether she would stop sending weapons to Israel she told Bash, “No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We have to get a deal done.”

“Adopting an arms embargo against Israel’s assault on Gaza is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic move to defeat Trump and MAGA extremism. It is difficult for the Democratic candidate to champion democracy while arming Netanyahu’s authoritarian regime” reads a recent letter to Harris from the coalition Not Another Bomb.

Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

“The real question should have been, ‘When are you going to start enforcing U.S. law as it relates to arms shipments’ because what we are doing right now, with this United States policy, is in violation of not just international law, but also of American law, “said the Arab Center’s Yousef Munayyer in an interview with Democracy Now in response to the CNN segment. “Vice-President Harris made it clear in other parts of her interview that she wants to be a prosecutor. She wants to enforce the law, but Israel is clearly getting an exception from the Harris campaign.”

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah. I suspect many of us knew her stance on this issue before she said it but she really did not need to say it.

    I appreciate the honesty but I do wish that she would avoid this one topic in particular. This is an issue that younger voters feel very strongly about. Younger voter turnout may not be good anyways, but I would really do my best to avoid upsetting that crowd. We’re not trying to make people go back to feeling apathetic regarding the election again.

    • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s good she can’t stop saying it. The voters deserve to know that she supports the genocide and to decide for themselves if her support for said genocide of Palestinians is worth whatever other comforts she provides the voter as a group.

      It’s right for people to feel strongly about support for a genocide so the focus shouldn’t be on not “upsetting that crowd” by lying, but on either not engaging in genocide (she’s eliminated this option) or on convincing them that supporting a genocide is worth what else she has to offer.

      (Inb4 whataboutism over Trump, yes he sucks too and is also genocidal, that doesn’t make Harris not pro-genocide and I never said to vote for Trump.)