• ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Considering how much stop signs are overused in North America, this is unreasonable. Either replace many stop signs with yield signs where safe to do so, or allow cyclists to pass through stop signs as if it they were yield signs. Holding momentum is important for cyclists.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Noooooo.

      They have those in France and it’s so dangerous! There are so many collisions that happen because of the right of way at intersections.

      I’ve driven there and it’s freaking scary.

      • ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think most European countries are designed this way. In my experience it just takes getting used to and is a bit uncomfortable, but it just feels so much more efficient, whether driving or on a bike. It feels unnecessary to have to stop at every block on a neighborhood street when there’s no one around.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a cyclist, I’ve seen more motorists blow through stop signs than other cyclists, and they are the ones who can kill someone.

    Idaho Stops need to come to Canada. Not only have they been proven to be safer, but it makes sense in a dozen different ways.

    I’ve sat at red lights (as a cyclist) and the light DOES NOT CHANGE unless a car is waiting at that same light. We’re talking 10+ minutes. Who the hell thinks it’s OK for cyclists to have to sit there indefinitely when no other cars are around, just because of some outdated laws? We need to change with the times!

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      As a Torontonian cyclist, according to what I see, we blow through stop signs way more than cars. Way more. Of course physically we can mostly just harm ourselves.

      But yes the rules of the road have to change in this regard. The status quo is clearly car-friendly. Not only it doesn’t prioritize cyclists, but it doesn’t prioritize pedestrians either.

      BTW, ebikes help negotiating the status quo a lot. They make stopping at stop signs trivial, as well as keeping a safe speed when riding where there’s no bike lanes.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m east of the city, and we don’t have nearly the same amount of cyclists as you do, but only very few ever cautiously ride through a stop sign. I won’t lie, but I did see quite a few cyclists going through stop signs when I was in the city last weekend… not putting anyone in danger, just to save time.

        I thought I read about a protest in Toronto where cyclists were stopping at EVERY stop sign as a large group, backing up traffic in an act of malicious compliance. I’d be totally down for that if crazy motorists didn’t turn their rage onto me, rather than onto these outdated rules.

        I agree that e-bikes can level the playing field, but the general public shouldn’t need to have a powered bike to have fair rules, either.

      • nicktron@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Have you decided to change your opinion yet, since you’ve had plenty of time to read about and fix your own “stupid” though?

      • Velonie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop

        See the section on safety. It’s safer for bicycles to yield at stop signs instead of come to a complete stop. The most dangerous part of cycling is in an intersection, and you’ll spend more time in them when coming to a complete stop every time

      • Polendri@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s hard not to see this as ignorance given how easy it is to look up the great safety record of these laws (i.e. right there on the Wikipedia page).

  • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cars and bicycles are two completely different things, and should have different rules governing them. A car is larger, deadlier, and takes longer to stop than a bicycle. A car going 40-50 kph is traveling with far more force, and won’t be able to stop as fast as a bicycle traveling 20 kph.

    It’s like saying cars and planes should follow the same rules. Or even better, cars and semi trucks. There are highway speed signs that state one speed for trucks and one for everyone else. Or certain roads where trucks aren’t allowed to drive on. We already have a tiered approach to motor vehicles, it should extend to bikes as well. Blanket approaches don’t work in our modern world when we have cars, bikes, ebikes, escooters, etc all sharing the same space.

  • zeeps@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you’re gonna ride your bicycle on the road, you better stop at a stop sign. Don’t be an idiot.

    • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, I always yield at stop signs, but I am not likely to come to a complete stop on a bike if there is nobody to yield to. Many car drivers don’t either, as any road user is already aware.

      • Szymon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        “Oh they’re doing it so I can do it to,” said the pile of bones and guts spread out along the intersection.

        Cars have a little more protection than a bicyclist for the occupants of the vehicle.

        • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          If anything, the fact that cars are more likely to injure another road user than their occupants, is even more reason that they should come to a complete stop, moreso than any other road user.