The 90-hour weeks part?
The fact that he was doing it for a fossil fuel company?
The fact that he’s worth fucking $9.5 billion?

Also, not in the headline, but-

The fact that he did it back in the 90s when you could actually successfully open a small business and make money from it as if it’s relevant today?

The business is a franchise called Raising Caine’s Chicken, which I’ve never had, but if you go by Yelp reviews, it’s either the best restaurant that has ever existed or pretty mediocre.

Also, Wikipedia says very little about his early life, but apparently his parents could afford to send him to a private catholic school, so he didn’t exactly grow up improverished.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_Graves_(entrepreneur)

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fact that it pays to be an awful person shows that there is just something fundamentally wrong with our society. Possibly our species.

    • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I would say society, due to having money being displayed as success and intelligence by a lot of major news sources, regardless of the process by which they make/obtain that money.

      • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        My Google news feed thing on my phone constantly has these bullshit side hustle articles. I hate everything about them

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure, but also think of all the horrible people throughout history that clawed their way to power and ruled both ruthlessly and successfully.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would blame that on outliers and survivorship bias. We don’t exactly care about the 100,000’s of years of relatively peaceful human history. There’s a reason “may you live in interesting times,” is a curse. We live in interesting times.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Peaceful relative to what? Historically, war and conflict has been the norm.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Not really. If it were, we wouldn’t have survived as a species. It’s what we focus on, but it actually makes up a very small segment of the overall human experience.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I disagree. Conflict is what has driven our development as a species. The first tools weren’t for building, they were weapons. Even today, so much new scientific development happens as a result of war, especially in medicine.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Tools predate humans… The first tools weren’t weapons. The first human tools weren’t even weapons for internal conflict, they were for hyenas, since that seems to be what was predominantly hunting us at that point.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Terms of service are slavery contracts that presume all persons possess the means to process and competently understand the choices they make. The acceptance of these agreements is the legal forfeiture of citizenship and democracy. This is the simplified core issue of present Western society. Ultimately, people have proven that they will sell democracy and citizenship to anyone willing to create digital novelties. This has normalized and funded exploitation and the US party of open legislative loopholes for criminals.

      Seems like a stretch unless you fundamentally understand the implications against the third pillar of democracy—freedom of information required for an informed public. Informational determinism is a cornerstone of democracy. This cornerstone is missing and the house of cards is falling as a result. Most of our present issues boil down to this one problem either directly or indirectly.