• 486@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 month ago

    I understand their reasoning behind this, but I am not sure, this is such a good idea. Imagine Letsencrypt having technical issues or getting DDoS’d. If the certificates are valid for 90 days and are typically renewed well in advance, no real problem arises, but with only 6 days in total, you really can’t renew them all that much in advance, so this risk of lots of sites having expired certificates in such a situation appears quite large to me.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s true, but it would also have to be a serious attack for LE to be down for 3 entire days. There are multiple providers for automated certs, so you could potentially just switch if needed.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The attack would only need to last for a day or two, and then everyone requesting updated certs when it stops could push enough people outside the 6-day window to cause problems. 6 days is probably long enough to not be a huge issue, but it’s getting close to problematic. Maybe change to 15 days, which should avoid the whole issue (people could update once/week and still have a spare week and a day to catch issues).

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      No one forces you to use let’s encrypt certificates. Can just quickly switch to another one temporarily.