• 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They think that just because you voted for a certain guy, it means you love him. Nope. I probably hate Joe Biden more than most Republicans do. Unlike them, I actually know some of his policies. Some of them are great. And some of them are wretched. But most of them are just business as usual bullshit when what we need is real change.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Many ways, but a good way to start is joining an org near you, like PSL or FRSO, or even the DSA with the intention of joining with Red Star Caucus (all US based orgs). Unionizing can be great as well, as long as you combine it with reading theory (I have an Introductory Marxist Reading List if you want somewhere to start).

          Studying the history of worker organization and revolution helps teach us what we need to do, and can help guide us in analyzing how our conditions are similar and different to find a correct strategy.

          • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            You can’t organize the working class with a “Marxist” reading list, maga was already told they don’t like that word. Speak the ideology of unionization while avoiding the things that can be associated with Marxism, communism, socialism, while remembering they don’t understand those things, they just have a trigger words they know to hate.

            As an aside when speaking to maga, don’t let the conversation ever be Dem vs GOP, always frame is as workers vs elites. In the former we are divided, in the later we have solidarity.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Historically, such a strategy doesn’t actually work. Sooner or later, you get accused of being a godless commie or a tankie anyways. You can either stand firm in your beliefs and attempt to sweep away the dirt of the Red Scare to accurately contextualize Socialism and AES states, or fail to support them at all, leading to issues like Trotskyism (poor understanding of theory and a lack of support for AES) or PatSocs (Nationalist Socialists in the Imperialist countries).

            • Grapho@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              What you’re saying is exactly the discourse COINTELPRO promoted in US organizations in the 60s and 70s (when they weren’t outright murdering the party members).

              How’d that one work out?

              It’s easy to deflect workers off the path of real, lasting change when even the organizers only try to do sloganeering instead of education.

        • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You can start by height. If that doesn’t work you can try favorite ice cream flavor.

          And no, boot leather isn’t actually an ice cream flavor. There seems to have been some confusion about that amongst us workers lately.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Where in the world are you going with this? Anarchists espouse the importance of organizing in addition to Marxists, albeit in different manners and structures based on different end goals and class analysis. Surely you can give an actual Anarchist answer and not just a joke and a jab at Marxists, right?

            • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              You’re right. Perhaps I need to touch grass. My “is this commenter worth actually expending energy” meter may be off.

              And to be clear, there was no jab at marxists. There was a jab at the lack of working class solidarity and wealth cult that exists within my everyday context in the US. Which you aren’t necessarily aware of and I wasn’t explicit about.

              Marxist and Anarchist end goals really aren’t so different that it makes sense to foster any leftist infighting. We all ultimately want things to be better for everyone, especially the working class.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Ah, gotcha! I’ve seen way too many people making jabs at Marxists these days so I got defensive. I apologize, I got ahead of myself. I agree entirely that at this stage it makes no sense whatsoever to engage in hostile relations between Anarchists and Marxists, the goal remains a more equitable society and liberation of the working class, and are more useful to each other than non-useful.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Indeed, it’s like “You think you’re owning the libs? Mother fucker my very existence complicates their plans.”

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Not good, still bad, just better than “holy shit why are we driving OFF of the cliff at full speed stop STOP! STOOOOOoooooop…”

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Trump is driving off the cliff at 100 mph, Biden was driving off it at 90. “We’re technically better” – when part of that argument includes doing hypothetically less genocide – is a losing platform. You have to seriously promise major improvements.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think what he meant was we need positive change. Burning our own country down is definitely change, but… well, I guess it’s what the (fucking traitorous) voters wanted, so… buckle up.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          As a foreigner whos seen what the US does to other countries, the US burning down sounds pretty good, and being a traitor to the US something to be encouraged.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nothing ever feels like it improves under centre-ground status quo politics. If things are miserable, they remain miserable.