• mykl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since light bounces off walls and is thus confined to individual rooms, there is less interference and higher bandwidth, and traffic is harder to intercept from outside.

  • Lazerbeams2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s interesting and I’d definitely like to see how this develops. What I’m worried about is interference from monitors and sunlight

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aren’t radio waves and light waves the same thing? Either this is in the visible spectrum and thus annoying as hell. Or it’s just marketing’s way of selling the decreased indoor-range.

  • techLover@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But, if light bounces in every obstacle, it will be confined to just a room or so… Then, I think is unreliable for the general public and will be only useful in specific situations… Which I can’t think of a single one… Not getting interference with Military, Hospitals and Airplanes isn’t already achieved by separating special frequencies for WiFi and Bluetooth? How that is achieved today?

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like even in situations where you’d use it in one room, Ethernet would still just be better

  • wutBEE@lemmy.wutbee.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could this potentially be viable as interlinks between multi-planetary satellites? Or are there solutions for that better worth exploring?

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Im not sure light is significantly better than rf in space, but I do think this was in starlinks plans for inter-satelite communication.