• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Phones should be turned off or left at home anyways when protesting. Here are my 10 commandments for engaging in protests:

    1: never bring your wallet/ID. If you need to buy things, bring cash

    2: either shut off your phone or leave it with your wallet. Recording police violence can be useful, in that case get the aclu app, a burner phone with the app, or an action camera

    3: never speak to police under any circumstance

    4: you can beat the charge but you can’t beat the ride

    5: bring water, it’s more useful than for just drinking

    6: bring hats, sunglasses, etc to avoid being identified by the state if it gets violent

    7: wear good running shoes

    8: know your rights, both federal and local, and when to use them

    9: take out any contact lenses in case police use tear gas

    10: stay aware of your surroundings; listen to picket line enforcers/community organizers

    • Mr_Figtree@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      These are all fine in the US, but in other countries not carrying proof of identity can get you into some trouble, as can refusing to talk to the police. Know your local laws.

      • ThorCroix@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is what people say about Germany but my teacher says that she didn’t have an id card for 10 years and only got one because of tour to a place organised by her university required to show id card to be put in their touring list. As far as her experience goes, no authority ever put her in trouble for not carrying an ID.

        The same way that the police never put me in trouble for mu id card not having my address.

        About not talking to the police, it is actually a right you have in Germany despite popular gossip saying otherwise.

        The problem of not talking to the police is that the police can create reasons to put you in troubles for not doing so, as the police have the privilege of authority, power and legal/public trust.

        But when questioned by the police, if it is worth, you have the right to have e lawer to answer it for you or to guide you on your answer according to laws.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can always be found not guilty in court, but if the police want to take you in, it’s better to just go willingly

  • VitaMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is scary because it could be exploited very easily by bad actors and is a huge invasion of privacy

  • CantStopPoppin@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they are allowed to do these other countries will follow suit. This is a dangerous precedent in which no one is safe regardless of boarders.

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they ever convince the manufacturer to enable these features, it’s time to leave that manufacturer

    • drvedder@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No an exact equivalent, but a common catchphrase during protests is “Police partout, Justice nulle part” : “Police everywhere, Justice nowhere”.

  • golamas1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the same government that says using an ad blocker, vpn, custom rom, linux and or encrypted messaging service puts you at higher suspicion of being a terrorist.

    I see them enacting these policies now as the large number of pro labor protests fighting the government all over the country on pensions “reform”.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re likely right for that assumption. Modern day terrorism I think would require a basic ability to use computers. It doesn’t make it likely, but more likely is probably right. I don’t expect much organized terrorism that’s not going to use some of those tools.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Our leaders have purposefully failed us. We all need to break out the guillotines.

  • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t imagine we’re going to see stories in the near future about how the police abuse these powers :/