That’s just God telling you to go to the bad gateway.

WFH, desk job, multiple monitors, remain sitting at the desk after work because fuck outside.

THERE’S A DONUT SHORTAGE IN INDIANA??!

I’ll airlift some in, you can price gouge them, we’ll split the profits.

I can only hope it was with a side of fava beans and a nice Chianti.

I’m sure that by “outsiders” you mean “people who go outside,” and I agree.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

Because you clearly do not know what that term means.

Gaia is such a slut.

Trump was never going to win Illinois anyway.

Carroll’s case is federal, this one is New York State.

I am right now sitting on a Steelcase Series 1, and while it doesn’t have great lumbar support, it is far better than any shitty $150 “gaming” chair, and is right in your price range brand new.

This is for the tax case; Carroll’s judgment for the most recent one was $83.3M. They’re both civil cases, though this one is NY State, and Carroll’s is federal.

In either case, if the bond amount is not posted, there is no appeal, and assets can be seized to fulfill the legal consequences.

I read The Fountainhead instead, and it was interesting enough to keep me reading. “Okay, there’s a lot of setup of characters and circumstances going on, I am curious to know how this plays out,” and then it just … doesn’t. It was all a lead-up to a long, weakly written, and plainly stupid monologue about how completely ruthless all people should be at all times, only ever thinking in the shortest term about themselves.

I closed that book wondering why Ayn Rand was famous for anything beyond being a shitbag, when I was young enough to be kind of a shitbag myself.

Why have I never seen this before?

The legal term for Engoron’s ruling (New York state civil fraud judgment) is “undertaking.” In the Carroll case (Kaplan, federal defamation), it’s “damages,” a large portion of which are punitive damages.

The E. Jean Carroll defamation case was in federal court.

No true Christian, amirite?

The meat:

“Having argued to the jury that President Trump has great financial resources, Plaintiff is in no position to contradict herself now and contend that she requires the protection of a bond during the brief period while post-trial motions are pending,” he huffs. “This fact nullifies risk to the judgment creditor and weighs heavily in favor of an unsecured stay.”

Only problem with that is that it’s not Plaintiff who is requiring a bond pending appeal. It is the United States of America.

He slipped real hard during his presidential bid. Remember how his VP pick was Sarah Palin, for example.

deleted by creator

Post only links to articles