Is it related to real time kernel performance or libraries?
Is it related to real time kernel performance or libraries?
So do I. It sits in its vm jail and does its job, or I roll back the snapshot
Knowledge fight latest episode #978 tends to agree with your assessment.
Leaning into the grift
Well. Better start saving then…
Both can be right at the same time
People who do this are heroes!
I fully appreciate people who put themselves out like this, especially in subjects which don’t necessarily have a wider reach.
Thank you all, no matter your accent.
This feels like a winning strategy
… for now.
Moving the needle is so satisfying
Think of the environment!
Less Delta-V to eject them from the solar system.
Something something social vampirism?
Tiling window managers and vim keybindings are your friends
Yeah. I bet he wasn’t looking for a Boeing maintenance video.
I fully agree. It’s supposed to be the scrum masters job to keep that away from the devs so that they can focus.
Management and other stakeholders are also supposed to be in agreement on both the agile method, and also the book of work for the sprint.
Obviously, if some priority changes mid sprint which is important, the team can agree to pick it up at the expense of agreed upon deliverables
Yes. Yes it is. Well, sort of… Basically it’s getting a physical deliverable out of the door in a set time frame. Your team agrees that they can do all the work to bring a feature, x, up to spec and out of the door in (usually) two week increments.
However, that requires some caveats. The work is agreed upon by all parties that it’s doable - including testing, debugging and deploying. No other work (with the exception of fires etc) is to be introduced to the team in that period. All the dependencies have been highlighted and accounted for. There is a solid, agreed upon definition of done.
However, corpos don’t follow this
Our your mother using the vacuum cleaner after you had almost finished debugging the game you typed in from the magazine.
Or RAM pack wobble.
Yes