aka freamon

Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/freamon?tab=activity

Anything from https://lemmon.website is me too.

  • 3 Posts
  • 248 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 27th, 2024

help-circle










  • You can’t, no. PieFed and Lemmy are operating in similar spaces, but are completely different architecturally. PieFed doesn’t yet have an API. Unlike Lemmy (and a lot of other modern web platforms), it doesn’t need one to operate, so copying Lemmy’s to the extent that you’d be able to plug in something like Voyager would be overkill. It would probably also be against the TOS for Voyager (Jerboa actively prevents it’s use with anything other than Lemmy, even if the API is the same).


  • For clarity, it’s not Lemmy that uses ‘Article’. I can’t remember what does, friendica maybe?
    Lemmy uses ‘Page’ for posts, and ‘Note’ for comments.
    Mastodon uses ‘Note’ for both, with ‘inReplyTo’ used to distinguish whether Lemmy would call it a ‘Page’. It uses ‘Question’ for polls.
    Pixelfed also uses ‘Note’, with an ‘Image’ type attachment (I thinks Loops is similar, just with a ‘Video’ type attachment).
    PeerTube uses ‘Video’.
    Funkwhale uses ‘Album’ and ‘Playlist’
    CastoPod uses ‘PodcastEpisode’

    There’s no one universal ActivityPub server because the Fediverse is based on a broken promise: i.e. that you should be able to use whatever service, to interact with whatever other one. You very often can’t, because ActivityPub hasn’t been implemented by each platform as some universal thing, it’s been co-opted by each to serve it’s own purposes. Lemmy best federates with other Lemmy instances, following Lemmy’s way of doing stuff, but a good chuck of the Fediverse follows a different model, and is receiving their activity and quietly discarding it because it doesn’t know what to do with it. If all the Lemmy instances suddenly chose to use a different protocol than ActivityPub, most people wouldn’t notice the difference.









  • How does Piefed handle image attachments, btw?

    For comments: not at all. If a Mastodon user tried to do what I did, with the inline image, nothing would show.

    We could do what I think you’ve done, and regex the details of the attachment into ! [] () Markdown and add it to the text. There’s also a DB relationship between comments and images that isn’t used, but could be, I suppose.

    I’ve never actually seen a Mastodon user try to add an image to something that ended up as a Lemmy comment, tbh, so it’s not something I’ve thought too much about.