Does this mean corona deniers should stay out of our politics?
Does this mean corona deniers should stay out of our politics?
Thank you!
Our spirits are not broken.
Deals baby! After all the bloodletting… deals.
Who else?
Full disclosure: presently reading the Shock Doctrine — it is literally EXPLAINING everything these monsters are on about. She wrote it in 2007. It is about today.
Greatest format ever. I present you with the Demi-God of memes award for best use of THEY LIVE if you originated the template. If you did not originate you get the cool assed dude award for sharing. Many thanks.
Your lips to God’s ears. So done with Oligarchy
Listen… I’ve had to do this already in the thread… this thread has taught me just because I haven’t seen the headline doesn’t mean there hasn’t been one. For the record: latimes subscriber and nytimes subscriber but yes… careless assed meme maker
I’m not sure how I didn’t see all the press on this. I concede… I pulled the trigger too quickly. But fuck that guy anyway.
Exactly. We’ve never been closer to Oligarchical Dystopia in our lives.
It happened two days ago. I still think this is weird.
Thank you. Spot on.
I’m also seeing bizarre infiltrations of instances by likely paid teams of saboteurs who know exactly how to deFed the federated.
Where’s the “sort by most downvotes”? This is absolutely. Is Trump/Musk paying infiltrators? Seriously, dude can’t read the room. What’s going on here?
Translation into Donald-Think: Blue State bad. Leader blue. Me no understand issue. Me no care. Me good. Me very very good. Blue man bad. me mock.
This story has parallel construction written all over it.
It establishes how careful his behavior was during those three months. Obviously he was not famous for murder during that time, but it might lead us to believe that a person living on a post pandemic world and seeking to remain anonymous might have chosen a mask at Mc Ds? For that matter… why not on the sidewalk where the event happened?
I’m pretty cynical and I’m nowhere near this cynical.
Is your interest in this “the guy in custody is an imposter” theory is because we want so much for the actual act-doer to still be out there? I confess… I like that world. But a “hero” arising to assume the shooter’s identity feels even more fantastical than my original musing that covert agencies are trying to hide their existence by having a wage slave take credit for calling this in.
You are no Luigi.