You fell into the asymptote; even the mighty beanie can’t divide by zero. Try wearing a single thread from a beanie instead.
You fell into the asymptote; even the mighty beanie can’t divide by zero. Try wearing a single thread from a beanie instead.
Eh, look into the exploitation of child gambling in CS. Gabe’s no saint sadly.
You’re absolutely right, you could take any binary that runs under an OS and set up a bootloader to execute it directly without an OS.
The problem is that all programs, even ones in C, rely invisibly and enormously on the OS abstracting away hardware for them. The python interpreter doesn’t know the first thing about how to parse the raw bytes on a hard drive to find the location of the bytes that belong to a given file path. Files and filesystems are ‘fake’ when you get down to it, and the OS creates that fiction so each program doesn’t have to be customized per PC setup.
So, ironically, to be able to truly kernel hack in python like you want would require writing tons of C to replace all OS hooks (like fopen
to interact with a file, e.g.) with code that knows how to directly manipulate your hardware (speaking PCIe/NVMe to get to the disk, speaking GPT to find the partition on the disk, speaking ext4 to find the file in the partition, e.g.).
OSes are complex as hell for a reason, and by retrofitting python to run on bare metal like that would require recreating that complexity in the interpreter.
I see your point on altruism, it seems a much larger problem with large-scale anarchism. I think my primary issue with what you’re describing is that I hold a dim view of planned economies. Thanks for explaining.
Star Trek isn’t a realistic model, though. I understand the goal you’re describing, but what’s the motivation that gets enough of the population to play along?
I just can’t see how you aren’t describing feudalism once anarchist communities become large and widespread enough to create resource competition between them. Some people are just always going to accumulate some foothold of power and then it’s all downhill from there.
I want to love anarchism and communism, but I can never escape the fact that they require consistent, universal altruism in a way that just seems utopian to me. It comes across as maybe the ultimate example of perfect-is-the-enemy-of-good.
The networking aspect will likely be the trickiest, but if you’re already interested in administrating a VPS you can absolutely do it.
A
record to point to that address!Not hard, but not exactly uncomplicated either.
How do you mean in terms of Unreal?
Captures from an Internet Archive sweep of the web. There are so many captures since the domain has been active since the 90s and was part of a great many scans.
Wow, who hurt you? Vim is fun, and just because you can make things work without it doesn’t mean it has no practical benefit. It’s nice to have an editor as powerful as an IDE that doesn’t require a graphical environment.
Hundreds of shortcuts is emacs, by the way. A major perk of modal editing and the vi editing language is that you can compose relatively few operations to accomplish many tasks rather than memorizing lots of more complex and specific shortcuts.
We keep a square of rug gripper pad in the kitchen for just such occasions.
Of course, but it’s not clear at all that’s what’s happening in the screenshot.
Part of the drama is people getting in trouble for using they/them, look at the screenshot being used against Gormadt in this very thread.
It’s a thorny issue to be sure, but I still struggle to see what’s wrong with they/them.
It’s hilarious! My favorite Bale performance easily. Willem Dafoe is excellent too. I love the whole over-the-top 80s NYC yuppie caricature.
It’s also a scathing nightmare parable about the raw pursuit of wealth and influence.
A million to one of course.
edit: but still, they come!
Binary speed is really the least reason to do it. Whether it’s worth it or not is up to the individual, but there are a lot of little reasons Gentoo is uniquely powerful.
Benefits specific to compiling:
Who said anything about capitalism? I’m talking about centralization. Expecting countless individuals to be able to do something as well as specialists can do it just doesn’t make sense to me.
“Personal responsibility” is a red herring used by those in power to try and shift the blame off of institutions with real power. We need institutional change first and foremost.
Off-gridders are primarily dilettantes who have the money to pretend they’re disconnected from the system.
I see what you’re saying. I find it hard to believe vanlifers and offgridders are the vanguard of a more sustainable future though.
I don’t see how all the world’s people individually handling waste can work better than centralized expert processing, especially in more dense areas.
Off-grid living more environmental than proper municipal water treatment? How do you figure?
It’s redundant but it still works; doing it that way does not imply they haven’t actually used it.