• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      ah yes the 10th place - still, Doge is estimated to use ~1% of the energy Bitcoin uses and it’s been in steady decline since the meme blew up.

      • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        >it’s been in steady decline since the meme blew up.

        it got a pretty big bump from elon a couple years back, but dogecoin is nearly perfect money. it isn’t deflationary, it’s cheap to transact, and the on-ramps are ubiquitous.

      • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        the entire Bitcoin block chain could be run on the phone I’m using to write this. there is nothing inherent to the protocol that dictates such massive power use.

        and dogecoin merge mines with all the other script coins so how can you even calculate its independent usage?

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          there is nothing inherent to the protocol that dictates such massive power use.

          Yes there is, massive power use is the entire point of proof-of-work. If Bitcoin blocks could be produced without massive power use then the blockchain’s system of validation would fail and 51% attacks would be trivial.

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            the hash rate for the first blocks was achievable with a pentium 3. the protocol functioned then. there is nothing inherent to the protocol that dictates more hashpower is used. a 51% attack is the protocol functioning properly.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s because there were just a handful of people mining the first blocks and there was no demand, so the price was basically zero.

              The protocol is meant to promote decentralization, so I have no idea how a 51% attack would be an example of the protocol functioning properly. A 51% attack is a demonstration that the protocol is controlled by a single entity.

            • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              then there’s no reason to believe they got it wrong.

              also they’re vague estimates, even bitcoin has a huge margin for error.

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                there is every reason to not believe them. they clearly have a motivation to paint power consumption as worse than is true, and the complexity of extracting the use of dogecoin mining from the rest of the mergedmine is, personally, unfathomable. maybe i’m dumb and there is a simple calculation that can be done, but without evidence of their methodology, i’m not going to believe them, and no one should.