The White House wants to ‘cryptographically verify’ videos of Joe Biden so viewers don’t mistake them for AI deepfakes::Biden’s AI advisor Ben Buchanan said a method of clearly verifying White House releases is “in the works.”

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have said for years all media that needs to be verifiable needs to be signed. Gpg signing lets gooo

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      Very few people understand why a GPG signature is reliable or how to check it. Malicious actors will add a “GPG Signed” watermark to their fake videos and call it a day, and 90% of victims will believe it.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, it’s not. People don’t use VLC to watch misinformation videos. They see it on Reddit, Facebook, YouTube, or TikTok.

        • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          And that will in no way be the first step on the road to VLC deciding which videos it allows you to play…

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah but all it takes is proving it doesn’t have the right signature and you can make the Social Media corpo take every piece of media with that signature just for that alone.

        What’s even better is that you can attack entities that try to maliciously let people get away with misusing their look and fake being signed for failing to defend their IP, basically declaring you intend to take them to court to Public Domainify literally everything that makes them any money at all.

        If billionaires were willing to allow disinformation as a service then they wouldn’t have gone to war against news as a service to make it profitable to begin with.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      I just mentioned this in another comment tonight; cryptographic verification has existed for years but basically no one has adopted it for anything. Some people still seem to think pasting an image of your handwriting on a document is “signing” a document somehow.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The average Joe won’t know what any of what you just said means. Hell, the Joe in the OP doesn’t know what any of you just said means. There’s no way (IMO) of simultaneously creating a cryptographic assurance and having it be accessible to the layman.