- cross-posted to:
- games@sh.itjust.works
- games@sh.itjust.works
- cross-posted to:
- games@sh.itjust.works
- games@sh.itjust.works
I personally bought it because it looked like some innovation on the 2D Mario formula, which -to me- had become stale with New Super Mario Bros. The little I played multiplayer, I didn’t find it particularly great, mostly when players have very different level of skill. I think this might be a case of “correlation does not imply causation.” But what do I know 🤷
What’s a safe bet is -as the article says- the movie definitely helped boost sales, as it did with older titles like Mario Kart 8 Deluxe.
“Around half of all people who played, played in multiplayer” kinda sounds like 25% of sales were multiplayer sales. Still not insignificant and more than I would have thought, but it would be foolish to extrapolate from that and make a mulitplayer only mario next.
It’s nintendo that’s almost exactly what they will do.
Didn’t they already did Mario 99 or whatever and then sunset it because it wasn’t successful like Tetris 99?
Mario 35 was a special game that was only around for Mario’s 35th Anniversary. It was announced from the start as being a limited time only thing, it was actually very popular right up until it closed, just as Nintendo had always announced it would.
I still think they should have kept it around, but its removal was not unexpected.
It was pretty successful while it lasted, it always had a sunset date :(