• survivalmachine@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes, my state is far larger than yours, so that may be a difference. We only have 5G coverage in major cities and along interstates.

      • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, but I know what state I’m in. You’re not in Alaska or Texas or you wouldn’t be making these fantastic claims, so by process of elimination, you do not live in a larger state than I.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Then my next question would be why you think a states size has anything to do with getting good 5g coverage and speeds?

          • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, why would I engage with that sort of disingenuous nonsense. We’re talking about cell coverage. Area matters. Period. Full statewide 5G coverage may be possible in a tiny state, but it starts to get bad and then abysmal as states become larger and are mostly rural.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why do you possibly think that a states size has anything to do with where they place cell towers? Cities barely even care about what state they sit in. Hell, Kansas city is in two states. Cell towers are just put in populated areas. Not populated states.