Alex Deucher:

The HDMI Forum has rejected our proposal unfortunately. At this time an open source HDMI 2.1 implementation is not possible without running afoul of the HDMI Forum requirements.

  • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s not the point of my comment, the point is that whatever hdmi is, it’s got very healthy competition, so there’s no real reason for anti-trust stuff

    • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      No it doesn’t, because it’s generally monitor manufacturers that add display port, and people who want to run on large tvs are SoL

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          When most TV manufacturers are part of the HDMI “standards” committee, they obviously have a vested interest in not using other technologies, especially when they provide many of the accessories used with TVs. If they allowed competing standards on their TVs, why would consumers buy their products instead of the competitors?

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          A choice they are making in favor of a tech cartel instead of what is best for their customers, which is the problem we want addressed