• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It was nonviolent, until bosses/police starting shooting miners and their families, at which point it developed into a small-scale civil war. So yes, I shouldn’t have simply said blanket non violent I guess… I was just trying to draw a distinction between “let’s fight for justice for ourselves” versus “let’s storm the capital and do away with the leaders” as two roads (with the first being more effective, and the second often leading to catastrophe instead of the progress that was hoped for.)

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Labor rights and the labor movement throughout history in the US have been incredibly violent so I don’t know what revisionist history you’re talking about.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You’re right, I should amend my comment to note that it wasn’t non violent and basically a small-scale civil war

        Oh, hang on

        (Actually, I do think I should have said it was nonviolent until they started shooting railroad workers, since that one came first. I’m a little fuzzy on the exact chronology but I think that would have been more accurate yes. The person I was responding to just said miners so I said miners.)