Saw this today, and … well, I’m not going to be so forgiving to people suggesting to vote Third Party rather than vote for Biden. If Trump wants me to do something, and you want me to do that same something, that tells me you’re aligned with Trump.

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    That is not true of anyone who provides evidence in the sense that non anonymous sources can be verified by third parties. That’s precisely why anonymous sources are considered the bottom of the barrel of journalism.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      How do you trust the third parties when they say they verified something that can’t be replicated in a lab, like on the authenticity of an email?

      Why doesn’t that criteria apply to journalists?

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Huh, I don’t trust the authenticity of an email until I’ve seen some cryptographic proof (like DKIM, GPG, S/MIME)

        That criteria totally does apply to journalists.

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            WikiLeaks, for example, publishes all such headers. If memory serves some of the Panama papers were similarly authenticated.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              So you trust wikikeaks published the original headers?

              Did you personally verify the headers?

              Why do you trust wikileaks and the people who verified the headers, but not reporters?

              • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I don’t trust WikiLeaks, I trust the cryptography behind DKIM. I did in fact verify some of those cryptographic signatures myself. And you can too if you’d like, because the source material was published in full.