Not sure it takes a study; pretty well known by now.
More a fan of either “middle out” or bottoms up (trickle up).
In a middle out or bottoms up economic policy, the rich still get richer ultimately, it just happens much slower/isn’t nearly as severe (at least lifts the poverty stricken, and middle class [wealth wise] up at the same time); the only way the rich wouldn’t get richer, is if policy is specifically crafted to prevent the existence of billionaires, and their transference as generational wealth (or things best not discussed).
And yes, my naming sense is a Silicon Valley (TV Series) reference.
Not sure it takes a study; pretty well known by now.
More a fan of either “middle out” or bottoms up (trickle up).
In a middle out or bottoms up economic policy, the rich still get richer ultimately, it just happens much slower/isn’t nearly as severe (at least lifts the poverty stricken, and middle class [wealth wise] up at the same time); the only way the rich wouldn’t get richer, is if policy is specifically crafted to prevent the existence of billionaires, and their transference as generational wealth (or things best not discussed).
And yes, my naming sense is a Silicon Valley (TV Series) reference.