The fediverse won’t succeed at putting up a #Stackoverflow substitute and that’s a problem?

Just an impression: All the pieces seem to be there. But what’s required is a team, with devs, PMs and coordinators, dedicated to making a particular place in the #fediverse .

That’s resources and decently sized financial and organisational demands, especially to get a critical mass of users.

Is the fediverse up to that challenge? If not, is it an issue worth addressing?

@fediverse

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    yea … it’s just a chat about the fediverse, come on. I, like many here AFAICT on the fediverse, are here out of interest in the ecosystem/idea, and so are happy to talk about it.

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I fully support discussion and actually encourage it, but, and this is just personal preference, it must be done in an honest and open way.

      For the record, a recent discussion about this can be found here https://lemmy.ml/post/15471632

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m aware of the previous post, I’d commented in the discussion already.

        Otherwise, sorry to say, but I really am not sure what you’re talking about here. What sort of purpose could dishonesty here possibly serve other than plain trolling or drama milling (both of which seem unlikely on the face on my post)?

        If you’re serious about “goading”, apart from planting ideas and expressing demand, I don’t think any other post like this could possibly influence devs into doing something serious like this.