• pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m pretty sure :) has already existed before that. They probably already drew it into sand ten thousand years ago.

      • hazeebabee@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Whoa it’s wild that it was commissioned by a company as a way to improve staff morale after a series of mergers and acquisitions. Imagine being worried about your job in an era when job hopping was not common, & you get a smiley face pin from management.

  • Thann@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Imagine if this was copyrighted, now imagine a million things even more trivial than this were copyrighted. That is the current state of affairs with copyrights and patents in tech

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It is copyrighted lol. That’s why you don’t see that specific design much anymore. I was sure I read somewhere that the design was in copyright hell, which is why it isn’t used anymore. Looks like I’m wrong.

      Edit: actually, after looking more into this guy, the design is public domain. He made a whopping $45 off the design while others have made millions.

      • Ignotum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s how it usually goes, one person works and creates something, then some other person makes a shitton of money off of it

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The people who argue against copyright need to understand that one of the functions of copyright is to prevent companies with deep pockets from taking the profits you deserve for your hard work.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            “people who argue against copyright” tend to be pretty well informed on the history of it, and aware of the way it’s used today. Generally, they argue that it is not performing that function, and may often work the other way around.

          • BuckenBerry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            One of the advantages of copyleft, shame the only people who only know about it are the weirdos who use Lemmy.

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m not sure how official “copyleft” is, but it reads like the creative commons licence which which falls under copyright.

              So yes, one of the advantages, and explicit purposes, of copyright is that you get to maintain control of how your intellectual property is used.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Pretty easy to imagine. The smiley face is copyrighted.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Man, I was looking for some new sandals the other day and found some solid yellow ones with this smiley face on the strap but they only had it in size 11 women’s. 😩

    Realizing I was in the wrong section, I go one aisle over to the men’s and everything is just black. :/ Gimme some fuckin’ color!