• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    ???

    FPTP reduces your options to 2 (sometimes 3) and one of the options literally holds the stances you express worry about.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      FPTP prevents 3rd party candidates from being viable. Until we get an Alternative Vote, there’s little that can be done to get third parties successfully winning elections.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        and? Just vote for the candidate who best represents you. Bonus points if they want election reform.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why bother limiting it to candidates? I could just write down the person who best represents me.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            If they’ve got a 0% chance of winning then you’re throwing your vote away and paving the way for the worst candidate. As I mentioned, FPTP reduces the number of viable candidates, but you still have a choice.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              Everyone other than the top two have a 0% chance of winning. I could write down a fictional character and they would still get the same number of EC votes as a third party on the ballot.