In a pair of Truth Social posts Monday evening, Trump took aim at the electric vehicle industry and President Biden’s push for more electric vehicles. With this opposition to electric vehicles, Trump is likely trying to persuade Michigan voters to support him over Biden, who carried the swing state in 2020.

The Biden administration has pushed to boost electric car sales, with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) predicting that two-thirds of new car sales could be electric by 2032 under a new proposal released by the administration earlier this year. Last week, the Energy Department announced plans to invest $12 billion into converting auto manufacturing facilities into plants for hybrid and electric vehicles.

Trump also took aim at Shawn Fain, the president of the United Auto Workers, for supporting the Biden administration’s latest investment into electric vehicles.

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only the fucking Republicans would end up against innovation.

    The anti-progress culture war bullshit is overdone and tired. Give it a rest and let everyone else move on without you.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      anti-progress culture war

      And anti-science across the board. War on education from elementary school to college. Very unfortunate.

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.mlB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Republicans hate change. They hate that they no longer run the show, though they’re doing what they can to get that power back. They hate that the old white man doesn’t have the strangling grip on society it once had. They hate that minorities and women have rights, though they’re doing what they can to change that. They hate open boarders and people who feel more themselves as a member of the opposite sex. They hate what America was on the path of becoming, which was a place that truly welcomed any and all people.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have a word for that: “regressive”.

        Most of the world’s conservatives aren’t even conservative anymore they’ve become regressive.

    • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’ll only do something if he can force some of the production line through a Trump subsidiary so he can get a cut.

    • Catma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      He will yell, get media coverage, wait a few days, somehow declare victory and never speak of it again. Its the same playbook can we just ignore him until his court dates?

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we nuke the sun, we don’t have to worry about solar power. It would also combat global warming, which is totally not real. And if we just ban the sale and possession of Lithium, we can get rid of those polluting electric cars. It’s not regulation, it’s for the children.

      • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        LEFT WING LIES! The sun will pop because it’s a big balloon and fall into the ocean or fall off the side of the earth where the lizard people live and where Hillary vacations. You can see the chemtrails from her personal ufo that she keeps at Area 51. Elvis keeps his there too.

    • viperex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I hate everything about this sentence and the very real line of thinking that Republicans use. Because who else uses it besides Republicans?

  • cowfodder@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Goes to show, again, that this dipshit has no idea what he’s talking about. Detroit automakers have been steadily retrofitting old plants and building new ones to increase EV manufacturing capabilities.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about those of us who think that EVs only prolong the issue, and that better public transportation for everyone isn’t just a good idea, but the best idea for personal well-being, as well as climate change?

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but while I wait for that to actually exist where I live, are you OK with me driving an EV or should I just not leave the house?

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they should realize that those public transportation have to be powered somehow and that we have to keep developing the technology for EV one way or another because fossil fuel busses and trains are not the future.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, they’re already starting to move away from natural resources for busses. Granted, per person per mile, they’re already drastically more efficient than than any gass guzzler on the road.

          Not too mention that subways and light rail are already electric, and we’re moving away from fossil fuel power generation, too.

          If we built futures that didn’t need cars, with more walkable locations, mixed zoning, safe bike lanes, etc. our current car-centric society could finally disappear.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You should be in favour of EVs. Just large, bus-shaped ones. However private transportation isn’t simply going to vanish. So it’s best to support a transition to EV cars as well

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about those of us who think that EVs only prolong the issue, and that better public transportation for everyone isn’t just a good idea, but the best idea for personal well-being, as well as climate change?

        I’d tell them to be realistic, and remind them that a large percent of the population doesn’t live in dense areas where that type of thing is practical, and that personal vehicles, of some sort, will be required until those larger issues can be fixed.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better public transportation is an ongoing process involving restructuring towns and cities at all levels. Even if we were prioritized it like we should, we’d still need personal transportation for many decades.

        Realistically, even if we did rebuild all cities, towns, and villages to make public transportation more practical, there will always be someone who needs personal transportation. There will always be a need for trucks and tractors. By all means, let’s do what we can to reduce the need for personal cars, but we can’t afford to wait and we’d need EVs even if we achiebpved it

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not even consistent with their donor’s ideology.

    EV’s exist to save the auto industry, not the planet.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True. If you want to save the planet you’ll redesign your cities to stop the car dependencies. Allow people to walk, cycle, and use public transportation.

      Electric cars is just another ruse for huge car manufacturers to sell more shit to ruin the world slightly slower.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The anti-electric / pro-oil propaganda that “conservatives” pass around is really baffling. They have integrated this stuff into their core belief platform. It’s nonsense because EVs seem to be a really great option to solve a lot of problems, and you’d think people that complain about gas prices all the time would want to not have to buy gas at all.

      All the sense that I can make of it is that Russia is an oil-export economy, and they have been pushing the pro-oil propaganda into the “conservative” thought pipeline for so long that it just became part of their religion.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s more than that. A lot of conservatives think of texas and Dakota when they think of oil. They think of Michigan and Ohio when they think of gas powered cars. They think of Appalachia when they think of coal. And they think of all of this as what energy independence is. Meanwhile they think of California and foreign countries when they think of batteries and renewables. To them a windmill is ugly chinese made crap that will leave them with rolling blackouts when they need electricity the most

        More than all that though they think climate change is a lie to convince them to stop living the way they want and to take their jobs and make them subservient to the government. Because even if the democrats are right the new jobs aren’t going to someone who dropped out of high school to mine coal in a rural town in West Virginia. Sure Columbus might get more jobs, but zanesville wont.

      • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s performative opposition. No one really thinks there’s some kind of actually intellectually coherent views regarding incandescent bulbs, fuel efficiency, or solar power. It’s a conditioned reaction at this point. Sure, the oil lobby will oppose it, but it’s not like Big Bulb is trying to get rid of smart bulbs.

        They’ve been conditioned to respond to the talking point of “the government is trying to tel you what to do” to such an extent that Biden could win the next election if he announced a government initiative to stop people from chaining themselves to rocks and jumping into the nearest lake.

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the ten year forecast for fuel prices again? EV is the future, those not on board will get left behind like those in the 20s who refused to switch from the horse to a automobile.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems misguided as appeal to a big chunk of Michigan voters. The car companies are all retooling lines for EVs as demand continues to increase and they don’t seem to be turning over tons of employees to do so. For auto industry workers electrification seems to be somewhere on the scale between an lateral move and a boon.

    But I’d think it would still play in Alaska and the gulf states where all the oil drilling and refinement happen. Though I also suspect we’ll see hydrogen economy jobs ramping in the gulf states since that’s where Toyota has most of the US manufacturing.

    • Trashcanman@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only are the autos retooling factories to build ev’s they are investing billions in new battery plants. A big part of the UAW negotiations are making sure that future ev’s are made with union labor. EV’s are coming and dipshits like Trump won’t be able to stop it

  • krayj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Trump is likely trying to persuade Michigan voters

    Why would this persuade Michigan voters? Are Detroit auto-makers forbidden from manufacturing electric vehicles?

    • bitteorca@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt it. I worked at a big 3 plant and they were openly talking to the workers about shifting production from ICE to EV components

      • krayj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what I assumed but didn’t know, so thanks for confirming. What do you think that line I quoted from the article is trying to imply then?

        As a Michigan voter, does Trump’s vow to “end ‘madness’ of EV push” persuade you in some way?