• VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    57
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is why the planet is fucked, you all whine that climate change is scary but then you cheer on people attacking electric cars just because Twitter man bad. You’re all desperate for tesla to fail because Elon upset you, someone doing something petty that’ll have zero effect on Elon but will negatively affect a regular person fills you with joy because it’s a way of hitting back at the bad man. Totally childish and pathetic.

    Spend that energy learning about and praising positive things, don’t win by tearing your opponent down win by building yourself up.

    • MethodicalSpark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      All of the vehicles in the article were pre-delivery. As they were still owned by Tesla, it falls on the company to repair them.

      I’m not justifying vandalism, but the impact to the buyer is a delayed delivery vs a monetary and PR impact to Tesla.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ok… I’ll take the bait, can you please share links that show how the Cybertruck is actually good the planet? I didn’t actually read technical review about it. I mostly see silly (and sometimes fun) memes. I also recently read that EV in generals don’t have the same impact as electrical bikes, e.g https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2024/apr/11/evs-are-booming-but-electric-bikes-are-really-cutting-emissions , but maybe I’m misinformed and this vehicle by Tesla, despite its size, it’s actually helping. Can you please share a link to such review and/or studies with e.g Life cycle assessment (LCA) / ISO 14040?

      PS: to clarify I don’t mean articles about how it’s “changing mind”, I mean numerical estimations then comparison between one mean of transport, e.g non EV vs EV, or this EV vs other or this EV vs random electric bike.

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Its paint. They can still drive them. Stop being a little baby.

      Also, i don’t know about a single nice person that bought this low poly piece of shit.

    • arxdat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tesla is synonymous with climate destruction and if you believe otherwise demonstrates that you have grossly bought into their propaganda.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Their work sharing battery tech was monumental in starting the market and they’ve continued to really push things forward.

        I understand you have an emotional response to a distasteful man but ignoring reality makes you seem totally unserious and frankly absurd.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Right, I’m the one seeing things through a funnel of “emotional response” and ignoring the rest of the EV market because of nostalgia and a sense of devotion …

    • RobotDaniel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      No matter what cars will be shit for the environment in some way, things like pubic transport, bike infrastructure and more walkable cities are things that actually help