Maybe we should just start nuking the most densely packed cities/countries. Sorry NYC, Tokyo, and basically all of India.

But would this not solve the problem?

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Neither addresses the problem, they just both push it into the future. Half the population/double the resources isn’t even a reasonable amount to give much more time. It’s better for drama though, because disappearing 99% or more of the universe would have really set back the Avengers, if any of them made the cut at all.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s exactly my point, he could have made infinite resources, made energy infinite, made resources unnecessary, put the entirety of the universe in Minecraft creative mode, or just make everything into hyper realistic cake. Instead he picks the outcome that hurts the most people.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        He picks the outcome that’s the simplest to explain. But you could explain it as a sadistic goal, because look at what second Thanos wanted to do upon learning the universe didn’t appreciate him the first time. Kill it all.

        • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Really it can only be considered sadism, he absolutely had the power to unmake half of the population from the start of time, they never existed, no one died, no one mourned. Instead picked the option that would hurt the most people at random with absolutely no positive outcomes for anyone left.