• 0x815@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The book is a Musk biography by the author Walter Isaacson. Musk admitted his action to tbe author as the article says. (But, yeah, maybe if someone doesn’t read the entire article it could be misleading.)

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The book says he ordered starlink turned off to stop the attack.

      He only admitted it was always off, and refused to turn it on.

      What the book says is only alleged, there’s no admission.

      Edit: neither take is good, but one is vastly different from the other.

  • TrekHuis@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The US military should just take it over. Twitter (x) hiding reports in search results, then Starlink that is turned off all the time. Elon just plays to the highest bidder, and has no morals.

    • Jessvj93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly what needs to happen. He’s a coward and cost who knows how many lives giving Russia what it wants.

    • Mudkipology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      That just sounds like a great way to have the US Government in charge of when the internet gets shut down instead of Musk. He’s a garbage human being but this level of power should not be centralized.

      • bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        It already is centralized if one dumbass can turn it off 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      ?

      He’s a dbag of the highest order and I hope he cries himself to sleep every night… But no, the US military should NOT be seizing private businesses. I can’t believe I even had to say that lol

          • Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Elon is actively sabotaging the military of an American ally, he can go fuck himself I hope they take all of SpaceX from his ass

            • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t know that aerospace could be nationalized so easily. If that’s the case I’m for it. But otherwise the idea that we take private enterprise by force is unAmerican and unacceptable to me, no matter how repugnant he is (and he’s a fucking repugnant scrotelick)

          • dragontamer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is at minimum, a Logan Act violation if you want to get technical about it.

            Elon Musk has fucked US Diplomats over, by fucking our ally Ukraine.

            We know that someone as rich and popular as Elon is kinda-sorta untouchable. But I’d like to see something done in an ideal world.

            • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              0 of the 2 people charged in like 200 years have been convicted under the Logan Act. You might as well say we should nab him for jaywalking.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is plenty of precedent for nationalizing companies, and for that matter, it doesn’t have to be the military one would give it to anyway.

        • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Has the precedent ever been dissatisfaction with the private ownership? Or did we we actually require federalizing the output of those companies for national security reasons?

          Genuinely curious because apparently I’m the only one who thinks nationalizing Starlink is an extreme response.

          • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Admittedly, most examples I can think of for nationalizing things withing the US have been either when a vital industry (usually railroads) shuts down due to bankruptcy or labor disputes, or companies partly owned by foreign powers that the US ends up at war with, which I suppose could both be called national security reasons. That being said, while the Ukraine war doesnt directly threaten the security of the US, beyond I suppose the small risk of it somehow dragging the US in directly, its pretty clear that the country is not really neutral in all this either, so at the very least Musk’s actions here work directly against US foreign policy goals. Admittedly I do agree that nationalizing starlink is a bit extreme, Im not sure that the US government is necessarily a great choice to run a global internet service, especially one that is somewhat different to other companies of the same type (it operates vastly more satellites to my knowledge than other similar operations), but I do feel that threatening to nationalize SpaceX might be a decent way to get Elon to play ball, so to speak.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        US Government nationalized AIG and GM during the 2008 financial crisis.

        We don’t even need to be at war to take a company over. We just need the political will to do so.


        We shouldn’t nationalize Starlink because its a money losing dumbass idea though. Yeah it helps the Ukrainians, but that’s the only valid use, and 4000+ satellites for basically only war seems like a bad idea. Cell phone 5G service will be cheaper in peacetime, and wartime has other communication platforms.

        • Muehe@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it helps the Ukrainians, but that’s the only valid use, and 4000+ satellites for basically only war seems like a bad idea. Cell phone 5G service will be cheaper in peacetime, and wartime has other communication platforms.

          Uhh sorry but this line of thought seems pretty incoherent. Its use case clearly goes beyond just war (e.g. coverage of rural and wild areas where a land line or 5G will not be economical), since StarLink has gone online pretty much every global super power has started or announced building their own constellations, and during wartime you want to have as much redundancy in your systems as you can get, especially so in your lines of communication. And Ukraine is using it right now, during wartime. I can’t follow this logic at all.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bro he’s literally helping Russia, he’s a traitor to the US. Seize all his assets.

  • 0x815@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Half of all active satellites are now from SpaceX. Here’s why that may be a problem (March 2023)

    SpaceX’s rapidly growing fleet of Starlink internet satellites now make up half of all active satellites in Earth orbit. […]

    "These big low-orbit internet constellations have come from nowhere in 2019, to dominating the space environment in 2023,” says McDowell, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass. “It really is a massive shift and a massive industrialization of low orbit.”

    Why do governments provide Low Earth Orbit to one awful person?

    • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Low Earth orbit is the safest orbit because the orbits will naturally degrade due to friction with the atmosphere and fall back to Earth after a set number of years without a boost.

      Higher orbits are much worse because the satellites can be there forever and clog up space. Space is really big though, and we are not close to blotting out the sky with satellites, but we want to encourage the use of low Earth orbit whenever possible so we have control over it.

      • 0x815@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I mean is that such a communications system should not be controlled by a private company or a person. That should be under public control.

          • ass_troll@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Nasa does the r&d on tech that they hand off to private companies so they can make a profit…

            Sure spacex can clutter up leo but i dont see them sending probes to the outer solar system, maintaining a deep space network, working with the russians on a space station, or any of the other numerous things governmental space agencies can and have accomplished.

            It feels like you’re ignoring the giants whose shoulders lil musky is standing on.

          • Tim@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I feel like few people are aware of the billions it cost to deploy and maintain a large scale LEO constellation. If it would come 100% from taxes, people would get mad

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, they did space travel in the first place, during peacetime. An unsettled peacetime, but peace none-the-less.

          • 0x815@feddit.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It must not be the state or the government that controls such systems. Imho, these communications networks are commons and could be managed as such -e.g., by a cooperative or a cooperative-like entity, maybe even by a DAO im some cases.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        All true, but blotting out the sky isn’t what everyone’s afraid of. A chain reaction of space junk impacts that locks us on Earth for a century or two would be the worst case scenario.

    • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because governments are run by politicians, and they need money for campaigns.

  • Hellfire103@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Imma just delete the meme I made when he turned it on in the first place. This man is a cunt.

    EDIT: Looks like I already did when he did something else stupid.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My question is how did he know what they were planning? Was he monitoring them? Since he has already admitted talking to Putin, what has he shared with him? I’m starting to wonder how many Ukrainian lives may have been lost because of this guy playing both sides of the fence…

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does Musk speak Ukrainian now? Or were these soldiers speaking english over plain non encrypted means? There’s a lot of things that are not adding up to me that involve more than just musk.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Elon Musk has a top-secret clearance due to SpaceX, NASA, and Department of Defense contracts.

      That’s the thing: this guy STILL has access to the top-secret wartime intelligence networks, today. This is absolutely a problem.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but having security clearance doesn’t really give you authorization to snoop on communications and act on them. And it kind of blows his excuse of “just wanting to give people netflix to chill” out of the water.

        I hope he faces some serious repercussions over all this, but part of me doubts he will.

        • dragontamer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Who said he spied using Starlink?

          He has a fucking top secret clearance. That means US Satellites could probably see the fucking Ukrainians preparing this stuff or something like that.

          Top Secret clearance means full access to the US spy information network for fucks sake.

          Information he’d have need to know so that he can fly starlink satellites in a way to still let US spy satellites see the war, for example. He just needs a need to know and bam, he will have the authorization to get spy info.

          My uncle is a retired intelligence officer for the Marines btw. Top Secret is literally the top secret clearance. No higher clearance exists. All that bullshit with Manning was only at the Secret level for example.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Having Top Secret clearance doesn’t automatically give you access to all of the information. As you said, it’s still based off need to know, they arent just going to give him all military intelligence related to satellites, they will just give him the specific information they need him to act on.

              • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No one is saying that the classification system doesn’t need some work. It’s just an incomparable situation, Musk isn’t going to have months of free reign to just peruse the systems as Jack did.

                Counterintuitively it’s easier for low level employees to gain access to more, as they have to do more general work that necessitates broader access. In those cases extreme oversight measures should be used, and they were not.

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Useful idiot” is a well-meaning person who can be manipulated to promote a regime. Musk is an asset. He is providing direct material aid to the Russian war effort.

      • badelf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And a child killer. His actions directly allowed a particular Russian troop to target civilian locations.