In his Substack titled, “The Convention Spoke and Told Us: The GOP is Dead,” Kinzinger explained various examples of how the RNC demonstrated that Trump has succeeded in turning the GOP into a “cult of personality.”

From that Substack article:

It was called the Republican National Convention, but in fact, it had nothing to do with the GOP most of us once knew. Gone were the party’s serious policy debates and platform planks. In their place was a celebration of Donald Trump, who has succeeded in converting one of the country’s two major parties into a cult of personality. When it ended, the delegates sent a ticket into the presidential election with no true Republicans on it.

. . . Because it is now the Trump Party, the crowd in Milwaukee lapped up Navarro’s message of fear which, after all, is the gateway to rage. Few noticed that, contrary to tradition, past Republican leaders – former President Bush, past nominee Mitt Romney, and former Vice President Dan Quayle – were all absent.

. . . I won’t hide the fact that I grieve the old GOP and fear the cult of Trump. I am equally concerned, though, by Democrats who are shrinking from the fight, concluding that Trump’s election is inevitable. I would say that given a remnant of traditional Republicans remains, and independents must be turned off by a Trump who wants to be emperor. It’s time to gather our courage and energy. The fight against him is not lost.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes and no. The old GOP would concede an election, and that, it turns out, is a pretty fucking huge deal.

    • zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, they stole an election in 2000 and we just let that happen with no consequences. Nixon tried to cheat and was caught, and we let that happen with no consequences. They haven’t liked democracy for a while now.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wouldn’t say no consequences for Nixon. They would have impeached him if he hadn’t decided to resign. And the president pardoned him to not set a bad precedent but again had he not resigned with tact, that may not have happened.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          So, what you’re saying is, there definitely totally could have been consequences for realises absolutely. There weren’t any, but boy howdie there could have been.

          Look, I get your point, but the fact that avoiding said consequences was so trivially easy kind of massively undermines it. Most people would have a harder time getting out of a traffic ticket.

          • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            He had to resign based on public pressure, I would call that a consequence. No one in politics today really feels that kind of pressure anymore.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Again, because they hid their evil, waiting for the right time.

      and the right time is now. which is why they are so die hard for trump, cause hes the excuse they needed to go loud and proud and, they think, let them finally seize the country for themselves and get rid of the pesky democracy.

      Which has always been their goal.