The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    63·
    1 year ago

    Someone needs to AOC her. They have primaries, right? It shouldn’t be a given that she will be the nominee.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      28·
      1 year ago

      She has too much name recognition and not enough unfavorables for this approach to work. She shouldn’t run and if she wins she’ll be a lucky to be as coherent as McConnell by the end, but I don’t think a primary challenge will work against her. Hope I’m wrong.

      • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
        9·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think a lot of that name recognition is positive… As we’ve seen in the last few election cycles being a well known establishment candidate isn’t necessaroly a positive for a large block of voters.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        2·
        1 year ago

        not enough unfavorables for this approach to work

        Then she should be elected.

    • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
      17·
      1 year ago

      Could not agree more, and I’m going to start calling someone getting primary’d from the left as getting AOC’d.