An image of JD Vance allegedly dressed as a woman and wearing a blonde wig was posted to X, formerly known as Twitter, on Sunday. The unconfirmed image quickly picked up steam and began trending under the hashtag #SofaLoren, a reference to the iconic Italian actress Sophia Loren and false claims that the Republican senator had sex with a couch.

Many commenters online connected Vance’s alleged history of cross-dressing with his legislative history—which has long been a point of concern for LGBTQ+ advocacy groups.

The Ohio senator introduced the “Protect Children’s Innocence Act,” which aims to criminalize medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care to minors.

The Republican vice presidential pick also supports measures to limit classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity, and labeled critics of so-called “don’t say gay” legislation “groomers.”

  • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Everyone is aware of the GQP’s obsession with drag queens/trans folks/bathrooms/etc. You can attack this obsession with this photo.

    Also it’s not drag, which half this thread is calling the image.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Fair enough on the terminology.

      Everyone is aware of the GQP’s obsession with drag queens/trans folks/bathrooms/etc. You can attack this obsession with this photo.

      So attacking their obsession is okay, but taking it one step further and explaining that they’re not only obsessed but hypocritical somehow makes it out of bounds?

      I am truly trying to understand your point, and I think others have too, but it simply isn’t there. Can you just specifically say what you would like to see written when communicating this information to someone? What specifically do you want said about JD Vance when someone posts this photo? I think that might help.

      • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I never described it as out of bounds that is wildly mischaracterizing what I said. Move on dude we’re just not going to see eye to eye.

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          It was a question, trying to understand what the hell you’re trying to say. Don’t really think it’s fair to call that “wildly mischaracterized” but you do you.

          Happy to move on. You should really work on communicating your thoughts though. You’re not making any sense and wasting a bunch of people’s time who are trying to engage with you in good faith, and then getting combative when it’s pointed out. We can’t see eye to eye while you’re facing the other direction.