• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The original toot clarified that they were talking about direct measurements only (but evidence exists that this is the warmest period in the last 125,000 years).

      • Glitchington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, approximation is not a record therefore we cannot consider it a factor at all, regardless of it being our best estimate given our current data. You’re right, let’s throw it all out and opt for ignorance. 🙄

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          i suggested no such thing, you made that last part up for yourself.

          i am just highlighting that comparing data from different sources/methods of collection is not proper apples to apples comparison. but sure have a melt down over it lol

          • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sure we would take ice samples from the modern era, ya know if any new ice was being deposited. Other systems are pretty easy to correlate 1:1.

            Just because something isn’t digital doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or we can’t take observations from it.

            • sadreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t mean digital. Just daily readings with a thermometer across the globe v 1cm or whatever per year of a core reading for that location or a few of them.