return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoBiden spurs controversy by saying ‘We’ve got to lock him up’ about Trumpwww.washingtonpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down110file-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkBiden spurs controversy by saying ‘We’ve got to lock him up’ about Trumpwww.washingtonpost.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37arrow-down4·2 months agoMaybe if you hadn’t appointed Garland and instead chosen someone remotely interested in being effective, that would be the case.
minus-squareclutchtwopointzero@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down2·2 months agoBiden - again - shows how inadequate he was to run this election… People play dirty and he, as head of executive, was unwilling to draw a line
minus-squareabff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.uslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI am starting to lean into the view that Garland would have been a better Supreme Court justice than US Attn General.
Maybe if you hadn’t appointed Garland and instead chosen someone remotely interested in being effective, that would be the case.
Biden - again - shows how inadequate he was to run this election… People play dirty and he, as head of executive, was unwilling to draw a line
I am starting to lean into the view that Garland would have been a better Supreme Court justice than US Attn General.