These are people who would have never, ever voted for Trump, but billions of dollars are being spent by the Democrats to slaughter our loved ones and our families. Israel has been decimating south Lebanon, where many of our relatives live, and now this administration is deploying US troops to the Middle East. Not exactly a winning strategy if they actually want our votes.

Some people think of a Trump vote as a protest vote. I have heard arguments being made along the lines of “Trump is not the person who is committing the genocide right now” or “Well, we didn’t have any wars under Trump”. I personally disagree with this, and consider Trump to be a fascist and fearmonger who deeply traumatised our communities during his presidency. He was a hateful leader who slammed the door on refugees by implementing a Muslim ban. While he didn’t start any wars, he did escalate existing wars in the Middle East and vetoed a series of bipartisan bills that aimed at prohibiting arms sales to Saudi Arabia.

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Voting for the party which does not want to worsen the status quo might not work, considering the status quo is a minority of people exploiting the majority for power, and through doing that also making the environment worse for their descendants.

    • reddwarf@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Voting for the party which does not want to worsen the status quo might not work

      This might be the case, this is the ‘hope’ part I mentioned but it might work.
      But you can bet on your life and those you care for that the other party will try everything in their new found power to make things absolutely worse.

      I get the dilemma and voting for any party in this scenario is tough but I would still opt for the party of hope and which displays signs of change for the better.