• GlenRambo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    14 days ago

    I recently looked into them. They seem shit. Dodgey outdated apps to make them work and such.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      14 days ago

      Too bad it should be the simplest way to add wifi file transfer to a 3d printer

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I’d rather just have an ethernet port on the damn printer. You shouldn’t have to cludge together basic network device functionality on devices that expensive

        • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          At least my 3d printer was so inexpensive it’s silly.

          I’m pretty happy that the engineering team that built it doesn’t need to worry about networking code and maintaining a networked device. Jappy that an open source community does it instead.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          I like my simple one. I can do all kinds of hacky bullshit to make it do whatever I want. When you start introducing more things like Wi-Fi/ethernet you start getting locked in to their ecosystem. Which I guess is fine for a lot of people who don’t mind that but I can hook mine up to a laptop or pi if I want to add networking to it.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        If you’re interested and can get your hands on some kind of SBC (like a raspberry pi) Klipper has been amazing for my printer. You can also use pretty much any computer but it’ll be much less efficient energy wise.

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Does the printer need to be runing custom firmware for klipper or is it just on the external device? I have been running octoprint for a while now without much issue.

          • CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            Klipper requires that the printer is running Klipper firmware.

            OctoPrint can work with printers running Klipper or Marlin.

            Main advantage of Klipper is that it moves all the gcode and movement processing off of the microcontroller on your printers main board. Also, Klipper let’s you update firmware settings through a config file without actually having to reflash the printers firmware.

            OctoPrint works great as an easy add-on for a printer running the stock Marlin firmware. Main thing people want is wifi print uploads and camera monitoring anyway.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I tried them with a few different cameras. They sucked. They wouldn’t reliably connect to Wi-Fi, and they didn’t reliably upload images.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      That’s another reason why they’re kinda dead now. Closeted apps they have to maintain just to keep that garden walled, and it was a cost they decided they also didn’t want to spend.