No shit, we have those too, but they obviously cost more so it’s not as common. And that doesn’t counter the fact that in most locations, the code is to put the nice side facing out. Again, this is the point of contention, not whether a fence with two nice sides exists. Try to keep up buddy, if you can.
The picture is taken in the USA, if you want to join a discussion about fences in the States, then don’t interject your country’s rules. They don’t apply.
There is no codes that say that, maybe local bylaws, but to say code is just pathologically and factually wrong.
But feel free to provide the code that says this, if you can find it, you kind of need to support asinine claims like that.
Also nothing about this picture or anything OP said has claimed to be from the USA, but even than, the model
US building code has absolutely no specifications about what side a fence “faces”.
You realize CODES are entirely structural and would NEVER have a stipulation, like that yeah…?
So don’t confuse a local municipal bylaw/ordinace, with “code”, they a fundamentally different things, but of course a laymen like you would never understand a nuance like that.
When you finally resort to semantics to counter, you know you’ve lost, but… not only that, you’re absolutely wrong! Zoning codes are what state which way a fence must face. Lmao, how many more Ls you want to take buddy? Confidently incorrect again!
And it’s not semantics, I know codes don’t state it, and local ordinances do, and idiots like you conflate them which makes any intellectual conversations about it nigh impossible.
It’s always funny seeing a lamen talk so confidently about something they have no actual understanding about.
But sure “codes” state that, so let’s see one than, please. So I can show exactly what you’re conflating as “code”.
Your link is broken, but I can see it’s a PDF and its name, so I can tell that’s not by any stretch of the definition a code.
But I pulled up the “ordinance” that it likely would be referring (which still isn’t a “code”), and would you look at that, not one mention about what side it should “face”.
So again, laymen with absolutely zero understanding and this is the exact shit I’ve been taking about. You can’t even link the right thing, and it’s not even a code lmfao. But sure insult me to show how correct you are….
The link is not broken it works… and these are zoning code requirements that specify how fences are built and there is a section about which way it faces. I can’t help you’re computer illiterate and can’t figure out how to view a pdf. You lost buddy, you can try all the mental gymnastics you want but this is getting sad and pathetic for you now.
and these are zoning code requirements that specify how fences are built and there is a section about which way it faces.
You think zoning requirements are code…?
Your document doesn’t load, and sorry zoning requirements aren’t code, and I’m sure your PDF specifies that.
I knew you couldn’t find a code that states that, and you didn’t, but try to claim you did dude, sure.
As I said, laymen and the fact you think zoning bylaws are code is just fucking asinine lmfao. What a muppet. This is the EXACT thing I was referring to, and you go and prove it unequivocally for all of us. Fucking idiot lmfao, thinks zoning requirements are fucking code what a fucking idiot.
And not surprisingly, it doesn’t use the word code, nor does it refer to any building codes either.
They use regulation, requirements and standards, none of those being codes, and all have very specific definitions so they aren’t confused. Yet moronic idiots like you still do it…. See, you’re a fucking idiot that’s conflating local ordinances with model building codes. Codes are for structural things, not aesthetics you muppet.
Man… talk about confidently wrong. That’s not the document. And the link/pdf works fine.
Glad to see that you have great interactions with other people as well! I hope you don’t forget to downvote brigade them too!
Interesting that the document was issued by the City itself and clearly says “zoning code”. Weird. I mean superstar you can’t possibly be wrong!
Edit: oh and to preempt this, cause you might make the dumbest argument ever… No this isn’t old. I’ll even give you a big old arrow to point out the date for you.
You might want to call the Planning Services Division at Oshkosh and tell them that you’re right and they’re wrong!
No shit, we have those too, but they obviously cost more so it’s not as common. And that doesn’t counter the fact that in most locations, the code is to put the nice side facing out. Again, this is the point of contention, not whether a fence with two nice sides exists. Try to keep up buddy, if you can.
The picture is taken in the USA, if you want to join a discussion about fences in the States, then don’t interject your country’s rules. They don’t apply.
There is no codes that say that, maybe local bylaws, but to say code is just pathologically and factually wrong.
But feel free to provide the code that says this, if you can find it, you kind of need to support asinine claims like that.
Also nothing about this picture or anything OP said has claimed to be from the USA, but even than, the model US building code has absolutely no specifications about what side a fence “faces”.
You realize CODES are entirely structural and would NEVER have a stipulation, like that yeah…?
So don’t confuse a local municipal bylaw/ordinace, with “code”, they a fundamentally different things, but of course a laymen like you would never understand a nuance like that.
When you finally resort to semantics to counter, you know you’ve lost, but… not only that, you’re absolutely wrong! Zoning codes are what state which way a fence must face. Lmao, how many more Ls you want to take buddy? Confidently incorrect again!
And still doesn’t link any, what a shocker.
And it’s not semantics, I know codes don’t state it, and local ordinances do, and idiots like you conflate them which makes any intellectual conversations about it nigh impossible.
It’s always funny seeing a lamen talk so confidently about something they have no actual understanding about.
But sure “codes” state that, so let’s see one than, please. So I can show exactly what you’re conflating as “code”.
https://www.oshkoshwi.gov/PlanningServices/Documents/ZoningGuideFence.pdf
There you go moron, lmao, damn, you’re a fucking imbecile. Goes to show, you don’t know shit about building. Amateur, confidently wrong, smoke blower.
Your link is broken, but I can see it’s a PDF and its name, so I can tell that’s not by any stretch of the definition a code.
But I pulled up the “ordinance” that it likely would be referring (which still isn’t a “code”), and would you look at that, not one mention about what side it should “face”.
So again, laymen with absolutely zero understanding and this is the exact shit I’ve been taking about. You can’t even link the right thing, and it’s not even a code lmfao. But sure insult me to show how correct you are….
The link is not broken it works… and these are zoning code requirements that specify how fences are built and there is a section about which way it faces. I can’t help you’re computer illiterate and can’t figure out how to view a pdf. You lost buddy, you can try all the mental gymnastics you want but this is getting sad and pathetic for you now.
You think zoning requirements are code…?
Your document doesn’t load, and sorry zoning requirements aren’t code, and I’m sure your PDF specifies that.
I knew you couldn’t find a code that states that, and you didn’t, but try to claim you did dude, sure.
As I said, laymen and the fact you think zoning bylaws are code is just fucking asinine lmfao. What a muppet. This is the EXACT thing I was referring to, and you go and prove it unequivocally for all of us. Fucking idiot lmfao, thinks zoning requirements are fucking code what a fucking idiot.
I managed to find an image of it.
And not surprisingly, it doesn’t use the word code, nor does it refer to any building codes either.
They use regulation, requirements and standards, none of those being codes, and all have very specific definitions so they aren’t confused. Yet moronic idiots like you still do it…. See, you’re a fucking idiot that’s conflating local ordinances with model building codes. Codes are for structural things, not aesthetics you muppet.
Man… talk about confidently wrong. That’s not the document. And the link/pdf works fine.
Glad to see that you have great interactions with other people as well! I hope you don’t forget to downvote brigade them too!
Interesting that the document was issued by the City itself and clearly says “zoning code”. Weird. I mean superstar you can’t possibly be wrong!
Edit: oh and to preempt this, cause you might make the dumbest argument ever… No this isn’t old. I’ll even give you a big old arrow to point out the date for you.
You might want to call the Planning Services Division at Oshkosh and tell them that you’re right and they’re wrong!
Wrong document dipshit, holy fuck you are inept… you can’t even open a pdf. You asked for a link, I gave it to you, and you’re too dumb to open it.