Because to me, they seem like de facto "Agree and “Disagree” buttons, whether or not it was the intent.

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I honestly wish there was a moderation system like Slashdot. You got a limited number of points each week, and you could vote comments “Insightful, Informative, Funny, Overrated, Spam” etc. Comments, etc could go up to +5 or down to -1; and you get a slider to determine at what point value comments are hidden at (+4, +2, etc)

    It makes it so people can’t be buried into the ether by brigading (they’d have to keep up a sustained downvote campaign to continually knock it down to -1), and can ‘come back from the dead’ so-to-speak, and also allows categorization of comments and may even allow the filtering of joke-comments so that conversations stay on topic or just so that you engage with the serious content instead of low-quality stuff. This encourages people to comment more genuinely and productively.

    • rigatti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s really interesting, but honestly I think I like the simplicity of upvote/downvote better. It seems like it would take a bit of tuning to get the Slashdot system to work as intended.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Well, the simplicity of the upvote/downvote buttons are what also cause the drawbacks of people using the system as “Agree” and “Disagree” buttons. I’m a solutions oriented guy. Everyone always bitches and moans over what the problem is, and nobody ever suggests solutions.

        • rigatti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I like your solution, and I think it would be cool if some communities could try it out. I don’t know how that would work technically though.