• peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, think of all the new test patients for prosthetic design and human regeneration medicine!

    I’m so sorry, it was in my head and it was one of those things that if I didn’t say I was going to explode. I am going to hell and deserve any down votes i receive.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a morbid way of looking at it, but you’re not wrong. War has always been a big driver of medicine.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a lot of caveats to that. It’s almost never civilian related casualties, stabilizing traumatic injury, and increasing combatant effective hours. A soldier missing a limb can’t fight anymore, no DoD funds for him, unless troop counts are predicted to fall below sustainable amounts and you desperately need a way to keep troops effective.

        • Paragone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I disagree with the “it’s almost never civilian related casualties” bit, simply because of all the mine-created amputees, throughout the world.

          That MUST drive some medical-innovation, even if it isn’t flashy.

          ( it is really sad to be arguing this, btw.

          Humankind ought get a life. )

          _ /\ _