https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/police-investigating-vehicle-explosion-trump-hotel-las-vegas/story?id=117252987

The sheriff said Tesla CEO Elon Musk helped the investigation by having the truck unlocked after it auto-locked in the blast and giving investigators video of the suspect at charging stations along its route from Colorado to Las Vegas.


What if this hadn’t been purposeful but an accidental blast… and the doors auto-locked someone inside? Do you need Musk’s personal cell number to be able to get out alive? What even is this?

Seriously, how are Tesla’s not widely considered dangerous deathtraps at this point.

  • Odys@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t trust Elon, so I don’t trust Tesla. If I would get one for free, I would immediately sell it. I’m not against electric cars in general by the way.

  • TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cybertrucks have a lot of problems, but this seemed to be a clearly intentional explosion by somebody.

    That aside, can Tesla just unlock any of their vehicles remotely and access all the camera footage on it? That seems like a much bigger problem, especially since Mr. Musk is practically our next president.

  • Celestus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Serious answer: The front doors have easily accessible manual releases. Unless there is damage to the door frame/mechanism, it is trivial to get out of a Tesla with no power. These work even if the door is locked, since the lock is implemented in software

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      the lock is implemented in software

      things that are such absurd design failures it’s hard to say with a straight face

      • Celestus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        I don’t see that as a design failure. I actually really like them. Electronic door controls both inside and out, plus a mechanical backup only inside. It’s not a perfect design, but neither are mechanical door controls. It’s also not unique to Tesla: many other cars have electronic door actuators with software locks

        • Umbrias@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          other modern cars doing bad design is a known problem yes. im just hearing described differences but no benefits personally.

          • Celestus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            I’m not an automotive engineer, so I don’t have a great understanding of the benefits as perceived by auto manufacturers. Still, here are some benefits as I see it:

            • Cheaper (fewer parts)
            • More reliable (fewer moving parts, cables strained less frequently, fewer broken door handles)
            • Recessed door handles are more aerodynamic (not necessarily an advantage of electronics)
            • Remote door release (helps with frozen handles in the cold)
            • Cool factor (helps sell cars)
            • Flexible design (allows designers to do creative things with door handles/controls)