• Ajen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The only way some IT guy can notice it pinging the outside world is if it’s connected to the internet.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Depends on the router it’s hooked to and the level of traffic logging being performed. Being connected to a LAN is not the same as being connected to the internet.

          • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            No, it doesn’t depend on the router. The device can either send traffic to other devices on the internet or it can’t. If the device can ping something on the internet, then it is connected to the internet. It’s a tautology.

            • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              All traffic from that device is going to pass through the router. In order to start communicating with the other device, the first device has to send a packet. The router sees that packet, and routes it to the other device. If there’s no internet connection, things die here, but the router still saw that initial packet.

              • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Sorry, I realized I misread your earlier post. I missed the word “trying,” and it sounded like your were saying the device might not be connected to the internet even though it’s successfully pinging a server.

    • lgmjon64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      They connect to allow the vitals to be pulled into the EMR to allow continuous documentation of vitals for the anesthesia record or central patient monitoring. More and more frequently, the database is not onsite and is shared amongst several sites within a hospital system.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        But the device itself shouldn’t need internet connectivity for this. That networking should be handled by a local master device, the same way access control systems (e.g. Door badge readers, alarm monitoring, etc) work.

        Then this device would only use a local, isolated network to access the master device.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Or Facebook, fine too… and Instagram, X, Amazon, Microsoft, Google…

      • WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yep, we need broad sweeping data privacy laws and audits in every country for all software. Not just fear mongering over other country’s software.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not sure. If true, prolly just generic data mining?

      Would fake news ever report if it was pinging mountain view?

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Might also not be this device that was specifically targeted. The backdoor could have been placed in component firmware for any generic components this device uses, or in some general software library that gets used all over the place.