• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It probably annotates abbreviation of the full year 1985 1986 1987, etc, so people don’t get confused and think Tom Cruise was 87 when he married Mimi Rogers.

    I can’t say if it’s a good or bad annotation, but theres a possible explanation.

        • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Just to be pedantic, you should use “whoever” there, not “whomever.”

          To tell whether to use “who” or “whom,” replace it with “he” or “him” and follow the ‘m.’

          “he made this” vs “him made this”

            • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Sure!

              “If I’m asked, I’ll give grammar tips to whomever.”

              Whomever is tough, because often this would be constructed as “I’ll give grammar tips to whoever asks.” And you would use “who” there, because “whoever” is the subject of the clause “whoever asks.”

              Generally speaking, it’s usually safe to pick “whoever” over “whomever.”

              But if you drop the “-ever” it’s a lot easier. Anywhere you’d use “him” (that is, the objective pronoun), you use “whom.” To whom, for whom, by whom, etc.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Idk why or who makes the conventions. It might be a required format, kind of like how you’re supposed to start numbering pages in APA after the title page.