ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 3 days agoCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netimagemessage-square297fedilinkarrow-up11.93Karrow-down111cross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.92Karrow-down1imageCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square297fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoThe contract negotiated by the unions just defines the minimum, union members can earn more.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·12 hours agoI can’t tell if that’s a yes or a no to the question of whether the “we” that gets paid more than union members includes union members.
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 hours agoYes, because the union contract defines the absolute minimum of the rate, and union members can also earn more. This will be my last response, it’s frustrating, these are basic principles of how these contracts work and I’m tired of explaining it.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 hours agoSo their contract states that they’ll be paid $0.50/hr more than the wages they negotiated in their contract. Got it, thanks for clearing that up.
The contract negotiated by the unions just defines the minimum, union members can earn more.
I can’t tell if that’s a yes or a no to the question of whether the “we” that gets paid more than union members includes union members.
Yes, because the union contract defines the absolute minimum of the rate, and union members can also earn more.
This will be my last response, it’s frustrating, these are basic principles of how these contracts work and I’m tired of explaining it.
So their contract states that they’ll be paid $0.50/hr more than the wages they negotiated in their contract. Got it, thanks for clearing that up.