• TheTurner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s what cued me to hate him even more. My mom makes every excuse when I bring that up, even to this day.

  • DeusUmbra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just remember that there is literally no reason to attempt to engage with Them on any kind of intellectual level. Only give them mockery and shame, or ignore them.

      • DeusUmbra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        They only know like 3 emotions, anger, fear, and shame. They also feel them Very strongly. That specific instance was also a case of them hating being called a name they used to use for others in school, where their brains stopped developing.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve racked my brain with this and coming from a family who changed over years from Republican to Democrat, let me suggest some things:

      In terms of the high level grifters and psychopaths, yes, undermining the strongman image with things like mockery, humiliation, embarrassment can be very effective not only at getting under the skin of tyrants but making others realize the clowns they are.

      Shaming doesn’t work with psychopaths because they don’t feel guilt.

      In terms of interacting with average Joe Trump supporters (the grifted), I do think it’s worth planting seeds even if you’ll never witness the seed grow yourself. One such seed is attempting to redirect their anger to the rich stealing their hard earned paycheck. Any chance to spin the conversation to trust fund children who never worked like Musk and Trump hijacking our democracy should be driven into the conversation. They’re the real culprits for the pressures they feel.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      They understand they aren’t engaging with you, they are just playing their base. Democrats have to get that they aren’t actually arguing with the Republicans they are setting up talking points for their base.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I dunno why people are upset about this. I see the majority of people complaining about Dems “taking the high road” and avoiding dirty tactics like the Republicans take. “They should take the gloves off and get dirty on the low road”, “fight at their level!” I read.

    Then as soon as Crockett does take one glove off and makes one borderline offensive comment the reaction is largely, “ugh, no need to be ableist”.

    Guys, what the hell do you think the ‘low road’ is?

    It doesn’t start at breaking the law and blocking supreme court noms, it starts at political midslinging, and the dems are getting “wow that’s going too far”. Lol. They will not escalate to a higher level of personal risk such as breaking protocols and laws (as the R’s do) if they’re knocked back at the first rung. They see the public has a preference: protocol above results.

    (I’m about to get replies about how mudslinging needs to be carefully crafted to avoid any offensive terms to any group now. Be real. That is not always possible)

    • Dale@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Dems need to remember that if it’s not nazi rhetoric, it’s on the right side. The bar has been lowered to fascism and we still try to hold each other to absolute political correctness.

      We don’t have that luxury anymore. Do you believe in equality, the right to vote, the equal applicability of law to even the highest office? Great, you pass. Bonus points if you believe in a strong social safety net.

    • 10001110101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, but there was no substance. It was just name calling. I don’t think simple name-calling got the Republicans anywhere either. She could’ve briefly segwayed to making a point about his policies hurting the disabled.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        God I wish that was true.

        I honestly think a good portion of Trump’s popularity is his name calling.

        Now, to be clear, I think that’s something that only works with idiots. Further, I don’t think it’s a tactic Dems can really pull off. But make no mistake, being mean to the right people is what’s popular for the bigot party.

        • 10001110101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Nah, Sleepy Joe hit because it directly called into question his incompetence. Crooked Hillary worked similarly. His making fun of the journalist with the hand disease or whatever didn’t really hit.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Sleepy Joe hit because it directly called into question his incompetence.

            You’re right, I also questioned all of the claims about Biden’s incompetence. GOOD point.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s no reason to take the “Low Road.” Dems dont have to get down in the mud, and lie, cheat, and steal to win, they just have to play HARD BALL, and force the Republicans to follow the law, the rules, ethics, and especially the Constitution.

      It would have been really helpful ifntheyd started doing this during the Bush administration, and not waited until the MAGA Nazi Criminal Emterprise had alreadybwrecked and stolen nearly everything, but they can start now.

      And part of playing Hard Ball is dehumanizing the MAGA Nazis by applying insulting knicknames. Itbwill be more effective against them because they are treasonous criminals, sonthe names really stick.

      Some suggestions:

      HitlerPig or Agent Krasnov

      Couchfucker Vance

      Kapo Stephen “PeeWee Himmler” Miller

      Steve “Unwiped Asshole” Bannon

      Lauren Boobert

      Empty G

      Big Booby Bondi

      Goldigging Whore (applies to several, but specifically the Press Secretary)

      Nazis (applies to all Republicans)

      Pedophiles (applies to all Republicans)

      Criminals (applies to all Republicans)

      Most important of all:

      Traitors (applies to ALL Republicans)

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nobody’s ratifying anything. I’m using these names no matter what anyone says. But they are pretty good names (I especially like PeeWee Himmler), so I’m putting them out there and hoping others use them as well.

          Besides, I’m not Democrat.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            They’re fine insults. So was hot wheels.

            No one at comedy roasts takes these oversensitive criticisms of “the virtuous way to insult” seriously. Why is that?

            It’s a distraction.

      • floppybutton@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The only one I can’t get onboard with is Leavitt’s. That’s no way to talk about whores, comparing them to her. Have a little decency!

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        You are naive if you think you won’t get dogpiled by your own side for using even these names. To most of the naive liberals and leftists, the things you’re describing IS the “low road.”

        The left doesn’t want to win, they want to be angry. But they’re not as stupid as the right so that anger has to take the form of more complicated rationalizations, which is why you get people on your own side attacking you for making fun of some conservative chud’s penis size or other physical characteristics.

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m not a Democrat, so I really don’t care what they think. They have nothing but a losing strategy, so I’m doing my part to inflict damage on the MAGA Nazis without them, whether they like it or not.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      We have a deeply fundamental problem broadly with society that people want to be outraged and angry, so they will latch onto anything, this is why the left can’t organize and why the most successful political party are the party of orcs and violence and animosity and outrage, even though they have fewer people.

      The left isn’t much different honestly, they just choose to turn into raging asshats when someone breaks their unspoken rules and boundaries that make them feel “civil” and feel like the “good smart guys.” The right doesn’t have qualms about being the bad guy because they’re fucking stupid and we’re gingerly tip-toeing around them careful we’re going to hurt someone’s feelings, meanwhile on our side we can’t even form a single broad movement because too many leftists get twisted when someone in their own ranks says a word that could spark the outrage of someone, somewhere, at some point.

      I don’t feel like I have a team at all. I want the same things that the left states its arguing for and fighting for, but it doesn’t. It doesn’t fight, it doesn’t accept people, it doesn’t actually want change, it uses the same tactics of shaming and finger-wagging everyone, everywhere for saying naughty things, then wondering why they’re not getting more people or making progress.

      edit: your downvoting is as impotent and pointless as the fights the left takes on. If you think an argument against the left’s tactics is an implicit endorsement of the right, congratulations, you belong with the right, you are a reactionary and dumber than shit.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think it helps to get out of online spaces and interact in person with people. Text is always far easier to misinterpret or to misword, you’re more likely to find allies face to face.

        I agree that people need to be more accepting and slower to judge. There are a lot of anti-Trump/MAGA people out there who lack the lexicon to get across that they’re on-side and whom might make a mistake here and there - no need to flay them publically and turn them away.

    • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      ‘Useless sniveling little cunt’

      That’s literally all it’d take.

      You don’t have to be ableist to be insulting.

        • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          No I don’t think anyone is going to call a woman a sexist for calling a man a cunt.

          Certainly not as much as they’d call her ableist for making fun of his wheelchair.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Someone on the left will absolutely, 100% call you out for using the term “cunt” as a pejorative, they will bring up how calling someone useless is ablest, and probably some story about how “sniveling” was used as a slur in 1642 on a small island off Wales.

        Why? because we have an innate human response system to respond to dissent from our own “tribe” and as a result, people have learned to get attention by attacking their own tribe. They want to feel heard and feel special and know that if they offer some “counter point” they will seem “intellectually honest” and thus gain standing with their team, and again, we simply don’t know how to tune out criticism from our own people and move forward. It’s why we keep losing.

        The right wins because they’re too dimwitted to do this, they are mindless in their group support. They don’t have the language skills to form intellectual opposition or to “call out” each other, they don’t know how. This is all a great example of how nature doesn’t necessarily design for intelligence, and being smart can be a survival disadvantage.

        • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Congratulations on using 3 entire paragraphs to say absolutely nothing useful.

          This reads like someone who’s never talked to an actual leftist in real life. Please go touch grass.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            About the kind of response I expected from the people who don’t know how to be effective at all. Congratulations for accomplishing even less and making yourself out to be a generic zoomer who can’t think of anything original.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    He literally called Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas in his address to congress. That’s literal racism.

  • Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah, if you aren’t aware of the hypocrisy on the right and the ‘rules for thee but not for me’ mentality you really haven’t been paying attention.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Nobody cares. Not on either side.

      They love to scream and cry and whine when they’ve been disrespected, but nobody cares about inconsistency in our leadership. Nobody cares what’s true or not unless it affects them personally and immediately. Nobody cares when a politician lies, they don’t care when they’re inconsistent, pointing out hypocrisy is just more free-advertisement for them.

      The only way you can get people to actually care about what’s real is when you impact their comfort and routine. As soon as that happens, people mobilize and vote and form coalitions. To this end, we should all be a little accelerationist about what’s happening, because if they boil the water slowly enough, people broadly will adapt to the new normal and will go on with their day, even if they have to like, go through checkpoints to get to work. They don’t fucking care and they have memories of goldfish, so the only way we end this mess is get enough people fed up at the same time before the administration can pull some stunt like giving everyone stimulus checks.

      • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s their last resort, when the people rally and are about to take down the government. They will promise monthly checks of something like $1500. That will cut about half of the protestors out.

        Money is the root of all evil. It’s also the greatest human weakness.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      A politian is an elected representative. Their appointment depends on those who put their trust on them.

      How politians managed to create a compulsory respect towards them evades me. The position they occupy is not theirs and, for what it counts, makes them the voters and state (as in, every citizen) servants.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It shouldn’t BE a position that demands respect, it should be viewed as public service. We are their boss, we pay them. (I mean, we used to pay them, before we decided to allow corporations to own politics, now whatever salary they get as a politician is pennies compared to what the lobbyists give them.)

      If you look at political leaders and feel the need to use Midjourney to make a picture of them shirtless and muscular and oiled up while killing terrorists, you have a serious mental handicap.

      • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I see it the other way around. Respect can be lost.

        Treating people with respect is my standard setting. I may stop that if they lose my respect.

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          This is getting into semantics but I try to treat people decently until they lose the right to that through actions. You have to earn respect.

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    A good Republican is a two faced hypocritical Republican. Cant trust them as far as you can throw them.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I had no idea she said this until now and was like wtf is is hot wheels? Then read the comments…it’s Abbott!

    Jasmine Crockett just gained more respect from me. Fuck “hot wheels”! Hahaha

      • digipheonix@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Abbott’s neighbor’s tree branch fell on him. He sued his neighbor and used the money to run for governor. He immediately changed the law so lawsuits like his are capped and no one else can sue for as much as he won. I prefer to call him “limp dick Greg” but some like “little piss baby”

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      If Hitler had been wheelchair-bound would it be wrong to insult him using the wheelchair as a point of criticism? Real question not a troll.

      • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        We should criticize choices, not traits. This happens frequently when the public becomes upset with a trans person, using is as a reason to intentionally misgender them. Or using slurs to talk about a gay, PoC or religious minority when they do something shitty.

        Kaitlin Jenner has tons of wrong opinions but she is a woman who is wrong. So in the same vein, it is wrong to make fun of Hitler hypothetical wheelchair. Jasmine Crockett was out of line for her Hot Wheels comment, true MAGA has regularly said worse for years, but that doesn’t make it somehow not-albeism.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yep. Make fun of people for their actions, not aspects of their anatomy they had no choice in.

    • AlexLost@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It is, but it’s not fitting. It’s all apart of the “so harmless they are a pushover yet so dangerous they must be stopped at all costs” spiel. Otherwise known as BS.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      Joe Biden: slim to no evidence of pedophilia.

      Donald Trump: hundreds of creepy videos, photos and comments about his own daughter, including that he would date her (if not his daughter) and agreeing she’s “a great piece of ass” in an interview. One of Epstein’s best friends, multiple accusations from minors of inappropriate behaviour, first-hand braggart confession of casual sexual assault, found liable for sexual abuse and assault of Jean E Carrol, accused by at least 8 other women of assauly and rape including a woman who was 13 at the time of his alleged rape of her at Mar A Lago.

      MAGAts: “imma call him Pedophile Joe.”

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I just love that I cannot find a single place on the internet that isn’t infested with stupid propaganda like this.

      Like this is a top level comment in a post that has really nothing to do with Joe Biden.

    • elatedCatfish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      … Now you’re just making things up. You ever seen the actual pictures of Trump groping his daughter? Melania also has a photoshoot where she’s riding her son’s lap. It’s nasty lol and there’s actual pictures

      “My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body.”

      “I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”

      “She’s actually always been very voluptuous,” referring to Ivanka again.

      “Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t happily married and, ya know, her father . . .”

      “Don’t you think my daughter’s hot? She’s hot, right?”

      Those are all real quotes too lmfao