• Grappling7155@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not as much as they hope it will.

    Electric or not, we need less cars in cities, not more. Rather than making the next generation of mildly more sustainable but just as dangerous and space inefficient road congestants, we should be thinking harder about how best to meet people’s mobility needs in more safe, sustainable, and effective ways.

    People need options not more car dependency.

    Those resources are better used to build up public transportation, (e-)bike shares, sidewalks, and the accompanying infrastructure to go with it all, with seamless handoffs between modes.

    Electric cars are here to save the auto industry, not the planet.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Electric cars are here to save the auto industry, not the planet.

      This is an interesting bowling I haven’t heard before.

      Totally agree that for areas with any population density we need good, regular and frequent mass transit.

      I also believe that areas without good density, we need to convert to pockets of density to enable funding for transit. Also, hoarding ornamental land in North America is a dead old throwback to frontier days and we need to remediate those out to more shared or natural or aggro space.

      We’ve spent too many years enabling this land hoarding by changing natural and aggro space to fucking mcmansion estates and that shit has to stop.

      • Benschnickle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not just mass transit, we need to make cities walkable and pedestrian friendly. No more stroads. No more big box stores with ginormous parking lots. No more “outdoor” malls. It’s just extremely inefficient use of land.