• Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can easily just chuck paper ballots and write new ones. It’s easier than hacking a computer system. Trust me, I wrote through all of school.

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And either one of these attacks is high risk, low reward. Let’s say you can modify a voting machine or toss/replace some paper ballots. You, as one person, aren’t going to make much of a difference in the election results - especially national ones. Meanwhile, you’ll be risking significant prison time if caught. (And a lot of people will be watching during your attempt.)

      Scaling this attack up would require armies of co-conspirators all operating silently, nobody ratting out the others, nobody getting caught, and everyone successfully pulling off their missions. This is something that might be possible in a movie, but it’s extremely unlikely in the real world.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but any idiot understands that attack. Which is why the major political parties send volunteers to watch elections go ensure that doesn’t happen.