• DaDaDrood@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what you are saying, is basing current morality and worldview on 1400 year old scriptures is not wise?

    • Here_in_Malaysia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve never seen islam defenders respond to this. The ones that did were just closet pedophiles who wanted child marriage to be ok again.

      Oh, I see! Islam defenders respond by downvoting with zero self-reflection! No wonder you lot have nothing to say! Mystery solved :)

      • e-ratic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Same with the catholic church and child abuse. If they didn’t know any better because everyone else didn’t think it was a problem at the time, then what’s the point of the whole thing? They claim an eternal and absolute morality but it constantly changes in reflection of when people change. Hmm

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they didn’t know any better because everyone else didn’t think it was a problem at the time…

          I think this DOES make the Catholic Church situation different. The CC damn well did think it was a problem which is why they kept covering it up.

          At least the Muslims were open about it from the beginning but you won’t find any CC literature talking about CSA and Child Marriage (at less than 10 years old) being okie-dokie.